[NIKON D4, 85.0 mm f/1.8, Mode = Manual, ISO 50, 1/60, ƒ/2.8, (35mm = 85)]

When shooting headshots/portraits, I have found that when using a zoom lens, I tend to move back and forth too much, distorting the person’s face.

A few years ago, I ran a test with my lenses to see which lens I preferred, and here is that test.

Now I don’t always shoot it wide open at ƒ/1.8. Often when I get close enough to fill the frame, this is too shallow.

If I back up and get a 3/4 photo of a person, then the ƒ/1.8 can work well. You see, the closer you get, the depth of field shallower. So, if you back up, you increase that depth-of-field.

It does well to help isolate your subject, like this couple at their wedding, but I still get a sense of mood with the background out of focus.

Now I can tell you the best thing to come along for Nikon was when they started making full-framed mirrorless cameras. I love the combination of the Nikon ƒ/1.8 and the Nikon Z6.

The Nikon Z6 has eye tracking that helps get your subject’s eyes into focus.

Hopefully, you will run your test. Shoot a portrait of a person like I did with my daughter, keep the head size the same throughout the frame, and then pick your favorite lens.

[NIKON D5, 120.0-300.0 mm f/2.8, Mode = Aperture Priority, ISO 4500, 1/4000, ƒ/5.6, (35mm = 360)]

I wanted to open with a photo of a young baseball player at bat.

A batting average of 300 or higher is considered excellent, and a standard higher than .400 is a nearly unachievable goal. Ted Williams of the Boston Red Sox was the last Major League Baseball (MLB) player to do so, with enough plate appearances to qualify for the batting championship.

So in baseball, you will strike out 7 out of 10 times at bat if you are perfect. When you start out playing, that number of times of failure is more significant ~ you are learning.

“My great concern is not whether you have failed, but whether you are content with failure.”

~ Abraham Lincoln

In every business model, you must make some cold calls to get business. This means you will pitch your product or skills to people who do not know you.

This classic study from Kenan-Flagler Business School finds that “cold calling has only a 2.5% success rate.” This 2.5% success rate means that an experienced sales guy can make one appointment or another good follow-up per working day.

When you start in business, you start with your network of people who already know you. Cold calling is made with a referral; the rate jumps to 40%.

“Remember that failure is an event, not a person.”

~ Zig Ziglar

In a nutshell, I have learned through more than 20 years of running my own business that too many quit just before their big break. If we know that the percentage of success in cold calling is around 2%, and you have spent the last couple of months contacting 98 different sources, the numbers say that # 99 is most likely when the break happens.

Since I was in college, I was always doing freelancing. Most of this was on the side until 2002 when I did this 100% of my income—full-time freelancing.

In 2002, I showed 35mm Slides and 6×7 Slides to get jobs.

When I lost my job due to layoffs in 1990, I sent out slides to get jobs. I had around 200 identical sheets of 20 slides that I sent out all over the country with cover letters. Not one job came from all that work.

I decided to return to school and work on my M.A. in Communications. I found a few jobs working in a portrait studio and later as manager of a one-hour photo lab.

When I finished my master’s in 1993, I sent out another round of portfolios. This time I got my job at Georgia Tech.

I believe that from the time I lost my full-time job with The Commission Magazine in 1990 till 1993, I must have sent out [Cold Calling] on more than 500 jobs.

“I’ve missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I’ve lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I’ve been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.”

~ Michael Jordan

Here is a great commencement speech made by Denzel Washington, which he said to “Fall Forward”

Today be like Thomas Edison and experiment. Try something, and if it fails, try something different.

Like Denzel, pray daily for the strength to continue.

Any marketing campaign can take three months to see the results of those efforts. Until then, if anything, you may see a slight decrease as the changes take effect.

“If you don’t fail, you are not even trying.”

~ Denzel Washington

[NIKON D750, 35.0 mm f/1.4, Mode = Manual, ISO 640, 1/30, ƒ/1.4, (35mm = 35)]

Why would I like this lens so much? I believe it is mainly because I can do with it what I could never do with a smartphone camera–Shallow Depth-of-field.

It is a great way to isolate a subject.

Bokeh is “the effect of a soft out-of-focus background that you get when shooting a subject, using a fast lens, at the widest aperture, such as f/2.8 or wider.”  Bokeh is a photograph’s pleasing or aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus blur.

Most of the time, I want to add the context of a person in their environment. Shooting with your lens closed down to ƒ/5.6 or greater gives you context because more is in focus.

However, the shallow depth-of-field allows for some context, often keeping something out of focus yet still discernible, like this of a lady working out with her trainer.

One thing that affects your depth-of-field is how close you are to the subject. Getting close will give you the shallowest depth-of-field. Sometimes if you get too close to some microlenses, your issue will appear out of focus because it is too shallow.

In this photo of the bud on the plant, you can see the “Circle of Confusion.”

In optics, a circle of confusion is an optical spot caused by a cone of light rays from a lens not coming to a perfect focus when imaging a point source. It is also known as a disk of confusion, a circle of indistinctness, a blur circle, or a blur spot.

I love my Sigma 35mm ƒ/1.4 and love it even more on the Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera. What a great combination.

When shooting in a restaurant kitchen, you don’t always want to show the working kitchen, but I still wanted to feature the team members. Shooting at ƒ/1.4 and getting close to the model helped me achieve a feel of the kitchen and keep details from being seen.

[NIKON Z 6, 35.0 mm f/1.4, Mode = Aperture Priority, ISO 1400, 1/1000, ƒ/1.4, (35mm = 35)]

The above photo was taken with my Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera and the Sigma ƒ/1.4 Art lens.

The flowers were a gift to us. The Orchids were given to us by Katie & Tyler of Nail Turbo in Roswell, Georgia, on our 25th wedding anniversary on January 6th, 2021. We started the day off pretty good, but as you recall, this was the day homegrown terrorists overran the United States Capitol. We decided to take a break from the news and get spoiled.

By the way, in 1996, when we got married was the year of the snow/ice storm that kept my family around Atlanta for a few days while Dorie and I got off to Cancun, Mexico.

The photo I took before this was with my Samsung Galaxy S10 on the portrait lens.

Now, some phones use software to create a shallow depth-of-field look. You can do this with many of the apps.

The problem is that when something is simulated, it can be close to the actual mechanical process, but I prefer to see what I am getting in real-time.

The other cool thing about shooting with a “Real Camera” is I can change the aperture with more choices.

Photos with different Apertures

Most people these days will not buy a camera if they have one of the latest smartphones. However, if you are serious and want more than possible with your phone, consider getting a mirrorless camera like the Nikon Z6 or the Z6 II.

This is Jo Fahringer who is a seasoned teacher in Kona, Hawaii with YWAM. [X-E2, XF18-55mmF2.8-4 R LM OIS, Mode = Aperture Priority, ISO 6400, 1/70, ƒ/5, (35mm = 83)]

Just the other day, I talked about this rule of communicating. The 7-38-55 rule is a concept concerning the communication of emotions. The rule states that 7 percent of meaning is conveyed through spoken word, 38 percent through tone of voice, and 55 percent through body language.

Now I work hard to see these gestures and listen for tone and word choices when photographing.

Time for 180º

I want to say right away that I am a lot better at watching and listening than I am with how I come across to others.

Speech difficulties, such as a lack of rhythm, an odd inflection, or monotone pitch, often affect children and adults with Asperger syndrome, which I have. Frequently they cannot modulate the volume of their voice according to their surroundings, so you’ll sometimes hear them being very loud in places like churches or a library. 

Right away, I struggle with the 38% tone of my voice in communicating. To make up for it, I often ask, “Does that make sense?” I know I have a problem and work hard to see if my message is clear and not lose anything.

People with Aspergers will gather enormous amounts of factual information about their favorite subject. They will talk incessantly about it, but the conversation may seem like a random collection of facts or statistics, with little or no point or conclusion. They may attempt to befriend or socialize with other people but make normal conversation difficult by eccentric behaviors or wanting only to talk about their particular interests. 

Over the years, I have become quieter in mixed groups because I know if I am not careful, I will talk about what is important to me and not aware that others don’t care.

I was almost always seen playing GI Joe and riding my tractor when I was young. I did this ALL THE TIME. I think it was easier for my family to let me go and play than to try to get me to have other interests.

Today I have a few topics I have spent far more time understanding than the average person.

When I am in the midst of thought, it is almost super crucial that I finish it. It is mainly because if we move on and I don’t finish it, I will not remember later what I was thinking, which can make me beat myself up. The problem with this is then the conversation is all about me finishing my thoughts.

When you speak, you hear yourself very differently from how others listen to you. This is because the sound waves travel through your head to your ears, where they are detected.

If you record your voice and listen to it, you will hear your voice very close to what everyone else does. Which is typically very different from how we hear our voice directly when we speak; the vibrations from our vocal cords reach our ear and change how we interpret the sound in our brain.

We all have different hearing abilities, so even when a bunch of people listens to the same recorded voice, it will probably not be the same sounds for all.

One of the best things you can do is to record yourself using video. This will let you hear your tone and see your body language. It is awkward to do but is one of the best ways to correct your behaviors.

I was privileged to spend a few days photographing Alan Alda in July 1995 while he was filming his show on the Georgia Tech campus. The Aerial Robotics Competition was before GPS would be used as we do today with drones.

What fascinated me all week was watching Alan Alda ask questions off camera and then realize he needed that comment for the TV show. He then asked the film crew to capture him, questioning the expert. What was wild is Alan Alda asked that question with the exact words, tone, and body language than helped him elicit the same response.

He did this over and over again. He also knew where I was standing, and the people next to him asked which lens I was using. Then he helped put the people around him in a better position than I could have ever instructed him to do. Why could he do this? Well, he was not just an actor but a director.

Time to Evaluate

In business, you need to hone your presentations to clients. It would help if you also listened to them as well as yourself. You don’t want a canned speech that cannot be altered to the situation.

Have you taken the time to evaluate yourself and know what you might have done wrong and how to correct it in the future??

That is the point of this blog. Here are a few tips that can help you.

First, ask your friends to tell you how you come across and what you could do to improve. Good friends will want to help you improve.

Try recording yourself doing your pitch with someone. Encourage them to ask questions or do whatever to see if you can meet the challenge of picking the right words, using the best tone, and helping you with your body language.

Watch it with them. Get others’ feedback.

[NIKON D4, 28.0-300.0 mm f/3.5-5.6, Mode = Shutter Priority, ISO 200, 1/500, ƒ/8, (35mm = 82) Alienbees B800 off to side fired with Pocket Wizard Remote]

In 2012, my uncle Knolan Benfield helped me on a stock photo shoot in Hamilton Mill, GA. He took some of these photos of me working. You can see some of my setups using lights to help improve the images.

Here you can see I have four Alienbees B1600 hanging from the ceiling. Here is another photo without them firing.

Now by using those strobes, I got photos like these here.

The biggest problem with all restaurants like Chick-fil-A is there are windows everywhere, which makes everything backlit and can cause problems.

Even when shooting outside, I wanted good skin tones, and as you can see in the setup photo, the guy is backlit as well.

Using the Alienbees B800 off to the side as fill light, I help reveal the face of the buy and better color on the cow.

These are the clamps I used to hang the lights from the ceiling. They are called “Scissor Mount for Drop Ceilings”.

Call me if you want a class for one-on-one training to do this as well.

Shooting sports was where I always compared what I got to other photographers at the same event.

Theodore Roosevelt said, “Comparison is the thief of joy.” I want to modify it a little and say, “Comparison can be the thief of joy.”

I have never met a photographer who is not looking at the competition and comparing themselves at some time or another.

Comparisons can be Beneficial

Suppose you compare yourself to others to measure your personal development or motivate yourself to improve and, in the process, develop a more positive self-image. In that case, this is a good thing.

David Sutton posted his survey responses to the question, “How many photographers does it take to change a lightbulb?”

• What is it’s colour temperature? What operating system is it running on?
• This whole question is just another ego trip.
• The real problem is that the lightbulb reacts badly to criticism.
• It’s the tone of the lightbulb I don’t like.
• Nothing personal, but what do you know about lightbulbs?
• My mother’s aunt had a lightbulb just like it, and it didn’t need changing.
• It’s NOT the bulb you utter and complete idiot, it’s the person switching it on.
• None, anyone can fix it in Photoshop.

I am sure you have your list to add to this. If you need to procrastinate, then Google this for your amusement.

The problem with comparison is when it is no longer used to improve oneself but to tear down another person.

If you want to get better and have a good healthy attitude about your work, you can look at others’ work and not just learn from them but admire them.

Looking to others for inspiration (without comparison) is admiration. When we admire someone, we respect, appreciate, and feel inspired by their accomplishments. We are filled with encouragement and hope.

Prioritizing approval over feedback, learning, and growth will keep you stuck. You have to understand that each person has their path. What I have learned about this is that everyone has unique opportunities afforded them by things outside of their control. Face it, how you look had more to do with your parent’s genes than something you did. You do have control over how you take care of that body.

It took a while before learning to celebrate other photographers’ work. Unless the person was right next to me, we could not honestly compare our work.

One of the first places I started to understand why the comparison wasn’t possible was when another photographer was on the opposite side of the field, and the play was in front of them with no obstruction. I didn’t have a chance to get that same photo. However, just a moment later, I may get something they couldn’t call for the same reason.

Over time I started to learn how to look at others’ work and not just learn from it but admire it.

During the pandemic, I thought it would be great to use Zoom for FOCUS [Fellowship Of Communicators Uniting Socially]. Above is a compilation of all but the first few meetings.

I don’t think this would have been as successful if I had done this early in my career. I had to learn through the years that EVERYONE had something to share that I should listen to and learn from.

This has been an excellent year for me because of this group. I made it a point that anyone participating would be asked to be a presenter.

After the meetings, I often get emails and phone calls from people on the ZOOM call, and what is most interesting is they are talking about people’s work that didn’t have a reputation before the call. We have been blown away by people no one knew that well.

We have had many shares who have been guest speakers at national photography conferences, and even they surprised us.

Joanna Pinneo & Robin Rayne both shared about the struggles they encountered in doing stories. WOW! Usually, people with this type of experience show how successful they are with their work. Both of them shared how hard it was and how often they felt they were in over their heads with the assignments.

Here are three stories from the Bible to remind us how comparing to others only leads to real problems if we don’t exercise some humility.

• Jacob and Esau
• Joseph and His Brothers
• Cain and Abel

As Esau said to Jacob, “Let us start on our journey [together]” (Genesis 33:12), and may it lead us to trust, hope and peace.

Joseph, the most beloved of Jacob’s sons, is hated by his envious brothers. Angry and jealous of Jacob’s gift to Joseph, a splendid “coat of many colors,” the brothers seize him and sell him into slavery. However, Joseph had also learned about forgiveness. At the death of their father, his brothers feared that Joseph had been treating them kindly out of respect for Jacob. So they sent a message to Joseph saying that Jacob wanted him to forgive his brothers. Joseph wept, and the brothers fell before him, offering to be his slaves.

Friendly competition is highly effective in pushing people. Proverbs 27:17 “As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.”

Here are some questions that I ask myself when looking at another colleague’s work.

• Why is their work so effective?
• What did they do to make this happen?
• What circumstances allowed them to do this that I don’t have?
• What should I take away from their work that could improve my work?

If someone’s work moved me and made me take notice, did I tell them? Take the time to encourage others. We all need it.

While asking if a person has advantages that I do not, I am using this question to set up one for myself. What can I do that others don’t have the same opportunity?

If you are a professional communicator or want to become one, all this self-improvement can be excellent, but one last thing must be central for you to grow.

Everything you are doing is actually so that you disappear. To be the very best communicator is when people are so moved by the work emotions take them over. They are connecting with the story of the subject.

The best question to be asking yourself is, “How can I do a better job of telling the subjects story more effectively.”

Tweet

Many people fall into positional bias, comparing “up” more often than “down” relative to their standing.

My goal with the FOCUS group has been to lift others and not to lift myself. “Paying it forward” requires us to realize how blessed we are with all the gifts that God has given us and celebrate those gifts in others.

… “A person can receive only what is given them from heaven. You yourselves can testify that I said, ‘I am not the Messiah but am sent ahead of him.’ The bride belongs to the bridegroom. The friend who attends the bridegroom waits and listens for him, and is full of joy when he hears the bridegroom’s voice. That joy is mine, and it is now complete. He must become greater; I must become less.”

John 3: 27 – 30

Shooting a headshot in a hotel room is about having a compact system. Over Christmas, we were in Phenix, Alabama, and my daughter needed a new headshot. Her hair color had changed, so I brought this small kit to get her some up-to-date photos.

I had two Flashpoint XPlor 600 HSS TTL lights that I controlled from my camera using the GODOX X1-N transmitter.

The main light is used as a butterfly light using a beauty dish. I am using the Godox Beauty Dish Reflector (White, 16.5″), which has a Bowens mount that works on the Flashpoint 600 lights.

As you can see, I am also using one more Flashpoint light behind the subject. I forgot my 30º Grid, so I improvised and put a box around the 7″ reflector to act as barn doors. This kept the light off the background and created a lens flair with my lens.

I use the Lastolite Triflector MKII Frame + Silver/White Panels under the model’s face and on the sides to kick light back into her face.

For the background, I always carry a Savage Collapsible Stand Kit (60 x 72″, Black/White).

I prefer to shoot with the flashes in manual mode. I started with the main light at 1/128th power. And the same with the backlight. This had me shooting on the Nikon Z6 with the 85.0 mm f/1.8, at ISO 100, 1/800, ƒ/1.8.

I got this reading using my ExpoDisc. I hold this over the 85mm lens while facing the light with the beauty dish. I am holding the camera right where the model’s face will be. I take exposures and adjust the exposure using the histogram until I have a spike in the middle of the histogram.

Then I use the same ExpoDisc and do a custom white balance.

After shooting, I changed the depth-of-field to a little more depth. So I went from ƒ/1.8 to ƒ/4. I then just raised the power of the flashes by approximately two stops. So, now the main light is 1/32 power and did the same for the background.

I shot a few shots using this setup.

There is no light but the fall off from the main light hitting the white background. This gives you a grey look. If you want it black, turn around the background and use the black side.

If you want it white, light the white side with at least the same amount of light hitting the subject. However, I always recommend getting a pure white; give it one stop more.

Write me if you want to know anything about this setup that I didn’t answer in the blog.

Maybe you have swabbed your cheek and gotten your DNA profile revealing your ancestors as I have. My wife and I did the FamilyTreeDNA.

You can see the family trees of those who have chosen to share that are related. Ancestory.com promotes its product using photos like this ad here:

I have worked out a great workflow that works for me and my clients when I do photo shoots. However, when the photos are older and need to be cataloged, well that is what I am writing about today.

Workflow for Older or Existing Photos

First, you need to digitize all these images. Earlier, I wrote about copying images with my Nikon Z6 on my blog. To digitize slides, I wrote about that process here.

I want to pick up those photos that are digitized. I have been doing a few archiving projects and now have a pretty good process.

The first thing I am doing is ingesting all the images into Adobe Lightroom Classic. Once ingested, I use the shortcut in the Library Module “O.”

Lightroom will now look for people’s faces. All of them will be unnamed, and then you assign a name. Just click below the photo and write the name in.

You can then right-click and ask it to find similar faces. I select all those that are the same person and type the name in. Hold the Command key ⌘, click on all the photos, and then only have to do this once.

How many photos you imported and how many faces are in those photos will impact how long it takes to find all the pictures. I have been importing about 3,000 images at a time, and it takes a good hour or so to see all the faces.

Artificial Intelligence is great for a few reasons. First, if someone is looking for a photo of someone, most likely they want a photo where you can see them. AI helps you by only finding recognizable faces. Second, it is fast.

When you finish you can export all the images, putting their names in keywords and the people field. You can also write the metadata to the image. I do this since I am working primarily with JPEGs since they are older photos rather than RAW images. Go to >Metadata>Save Metadata To File, or you can use the shortcut ⌘S.

When Face Recognition was first introduced with Lightroom 6, I wrote a blog on it here.

Second I leave Lightroom and go to Photo Mechanic Plus.

Here I have a few shortcuts to help with speeding up Metadata.

Using the “Variables,” I put those into the caption field. So what I am doing is moving the names created in Lightroom from the “Keyword” field to the “Description/Caption” field. I also carry the location information.

With one client I also use {filenamebase} and {folderpath} variables. They had already tried to help in finding their photos by creating a folder system and filenames that helped with finding photos.

Their system worked like walking into a library, walking to a specific section, and pulling a book because you know how the system was set up. However, if you are as old as I am, you may remember going to the library and teaching you how to use the card catalog system.

I am taking that filing system and embedding it into each photo. This way, if you search for a topic that was a folder, it will find all those photos. You can then narrow the search with more words.

Third I will now add keywords to every photo. I use a “Structured Keyword List.”

If you create a taxonomy of keywords using the form of this outline about without the numbering, this can be used in what Photo Mechanic refers to as a “Structured Keyword.” It will look like this below, minus the bullet points.

• North America
  • United States
    • Alabama
  • Mexico
  • Canada

You can use Microsoft Excel and create your list as well. A column and indent would be the B column and so on. If you save it as a TXT, it can be used as a Structured Keyword list.

Click on the drop-down menu on the right of keywords in the IPTC screen. Pick the Structured Keywords.

This is the default that comes with Photo Mechanic. I have written my own for different clients.

This lets you quickly add keywords to a photo.

When you have done this just once, the keywords will be under the Structured Keywords, so you don’t have to recreate it if you want to use the same or another one you created. It keeps those as another shortcut.

My last tip is that you can simultaneously apply any of these to multiple images.

Select all the images or select CMD+I to bring up the IPTC. You change anything in this and then tell it to apply to your selection.

You can do the same thing by selecting images and CMD+M to rename all the photos you have chosen.

On average going one image at a time, it can take about 5 minutes for an idea to write a caption telling us the Who, What, Where, When & How, as well as adding Keywords. But using code replacement, structured keywords, and applying those to multiples when you can–will save you an incredible amount of time.

The last tip. Do this enough, and your speed will increase over time.

Child is fascinated by my camera and watched me as I was working at the Hôpital Baptiste Biblique in Tsiko, Togo, West Africa. [NIKON Z 6, 24.0-105.0 mm f/4.0, Mode = Aperture Priority, ISO 1400, 1/200, ƒ/4, (35mm = 105)]

“You’ll never look at other people in quite the same way again. Emotions Revealed is a tour de force.”

– Malcolm Gladwell

Paul Ekman (born February 15, 1934) is an American psychologist who is a pioneer in studying emotions and their relation to facial expressions. He has created an “atlas of emotions” with more than ten thousand facial expressions and has gained a reputation as “the best human lie detector in the world”.

If you are a professional communicator and haven’t studied body language, I believe Emotions Revealed is a great place to learn about it. Specifically, Ekman explores the facial expressions of people around the world.

Even in the book’s preface, Ekman warns that keen observation alone needs to be verified.

“… carefully using the information you acquire about how others are feeling. Sometimes that means asking the person about the emotion you have spotted, acknowledging how they are feeling, or re-calibrating your reactions in light of what you have recognized.”

– Paul Ekman

If you are a professional communicator and haven’t read Ekman’s work, you are missing out on what all research points to about human communication.

Dr. Mehrabian, in the 1960s, devised a formula to describe what the mind determines to mean. He concluded that the interpretation of a message is 7 percent verbal, 38 percent vocal, and 55 percent visual. The conclusion was that 93 percent of communication is “nonverbal” in nature.

It would be almost 40 years before his research on Ekman helped us to understand some of that Visual Communication.

One of the best parts of the book is the photographic examples he uses throughout the book.

One of the examples is Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald. The photo is in the book. He uses a few photojournalism moments in history to teach us about-face expressions.

Ekman is trying to teach us a new kind of awareness that he calls attentiveness. I believe if you can master the skills of recognizing expressions, you can learn to anticipate them.

If you can anticipate these expressions, you can capture them with a camera and use them to tell the story.

If you react with your camera, very rarely will you capture the tell-tale signs of the visual?

The work of Ekman was used in the TV Series Lie To Me.

Ocean Isle Peer on early morning walk on the beach in Ocean Isle Beach, North Carolina. [NIKON Z 6, VR Zoom 24-105mm f/4G IF-ED, Mode = Aperture Priority, ISO 360, 1/250, ƒ/16, (35mm = 24)]

If you were to look at the EXIF data on all your photos, would most of them be wide open or closed down aperture?

There is a perfect chance you fall into one of two camps.

BOKEH

If this word is part of your vocabulary and what you talk about when it comes to photography, you most likely own some pretty expensive lenses with an aperture of ƒ/1.4.

You may be just like me when I love to isolate the subject and simplify the composition.

Group ƒ/64

There was a group of photographers that shot mainly in large format and would close down the aperture to get everything they could sharp as possible.

In 1930 Willard Van Dyke and, Ansel Adams & Edward Weston formed the Group ƒ/64. They shared a standard photographic style characterized by sharp, focused, and carefully framed images seen from a mainly Western (U.S.) viewpoint. In part, they formed in opposition to the pictorialist photographic style that had dominated much of the early 20th century. Still, they wanted to promote a new modernist aesthetic based on precisely exposed images of natural forms and found objects.

If you were part of the ƒ/64 style, you had to pay attention to everything in the frame, which if you are familiar with Ansel Adams and Edward Weston’s work, you know they paid incredible attention to detail.

Form or Function?

Form follows function is a principle associated with late 19th and early 20th-century architecture and industrial design in general, meaning the shape of a building or object should primarily relate to its intended function or purpose.

Here are some ideas where Form is more important than Function:

1. Wood Floors in Bathrooms
2. Carpet in Bathrooms
3. Door-less Shower Enclosure

Sometimes, like anything in life, one side will win a bit more over the other. When you’re faced with any situation, I recommend you do what I do: do your best to see both sides of the story and then chart the best path forward for whatever situation you’re in. 

By the way, here is a sampling of images in Lightroom and their aperture for me.

ƒ/1.4	10653
ƒ/2.8	23389
ƒ/5.6	94475
ƒ/8	32147
ƒ/16	3346

When I started shooting photos for a newspaper in 1982, I often shot wide open to try to shoot available light with Black & White Kodak Tri-X film shot at ISO 1600. That was the high ISO available for most of my first twenty years of shooting film. They did make a new film that went to 3200. So, you shot wide open to get a photo.

BOKEH wasn’t even talked about in my circles until we started shooting digital, and the ISO 12800 or faster was a reality.

ƒ/64 Group wasn’t photographing people most of the time so that they could shoot long exposures on tripods.

When ISO 12800 was possible for me on my Nikon D3, I, for the first time, realized I could close down the aperture inside for the first time shooting with available light. This changed the possibilities.

You Stuck In A Rut?

Most likely, in photography, you are stuck in a rut. Most of my friends are due to how you learn to shoot. One of my friends teaches people to look for the moment. To do this, he tells people just put the aperture on ƒ/2.8 and look for moments.

When I started, I shot wide open because I didn’t have much choice, but after twenty years of programming, I found it hard to shoot other than wide empty inside.

Now when I am outside, I might shoot at ƒ/5.6 to be sure things are focused. This is true when I shoot sports. I don’t want the ball and the face out of focus.

If you started with Digital

Now, if you started shooting with digital, there is a perfect chance that Form was more critical than Function. You read all those articles about BOKEH and fell in love with the look. That is where Form is more vital than Function.

The sad thing is that even Photojournalists and Communication photographers who should be more about Form following Function will find that they want a strong image more than just a storytelling image.

Often I will shoot what I call a beauty shot, and while it is usually a strong visual, the story isn’t being told with the photo. I am using it to hook you to make you read the caption that will pull you into the picture.

These examples of my work are just about how cool something looks.

Compare that to where I want to include everything I can in the frame to help tell the story. This is where Form follows Function.

If you haven’t thought about it, you are most likely stuck in a rut.

Maybe you remember “The Kodak Carousel” and how you would take 35mm Slide Transparencies and project these onto a screen.

Since I can remember, until around 2002, all the photography workshops used these, and sometimes many of them synced together with a soundtrack to tell stories.

I remember arriving early to see so often the photographer in the back of the room for the event with a stack of slides, just putting them on the carousel for later projects. Every time I saw this, I knew the presentation would be lacking. They hadn’t put any time into their preparation.

Many photographers could still impress with their images, but they didn’t have a well-thought-out presentation.

One of the best-prepared speakers I have heard in the past year was Darrell Goemaat at the FOCUS Zoom meetings I hold weekly with a group of communicators from all over the world.

The key to the success of his presentation was putting in the time to come up with points that all worked to communicate a purpose for his presentation.