|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The other day, I compared the Fujifilm X-E2 with the FUJINON XF 18-55mm lens, shooting the same test chart as the Nikon D750 with the Nikkor 85mm ƒ/1.8G.
Some thought that this wasn’t such a good test. However, I was comparing mirrorless to DSLR and the sensors as well.
The second complaint was I shot at too high of aperture, introducing diffraction. So this is shot at ƒ/5.6 rather than ƒ/16.
Nikon D750
 |
| Nikon D750, Nikkor 85mm ƒ/1.8, ISO 200, ƒ/5.6, 1/200 under studio strobes. |
 |
| 1:1 of the above photo |
Fujifilm X-E2
 |
| Fujifilm X-E2, Nikkor 85mm ƒ/1.8, ISO 200, ƒ/5.6, 1/180 under studio strobes. |
 |
| 1:1 of the above photo |
Conclusion
IMHO the antialiasing filter on the sensor of the Nikon D750 affects the performance, and the Fujifilm X-E2 is sharper. By the way, the crop difference is due to the sensor size difference.
When running the images full-frame, I think the extra megapixels of the 24 MP Nikon may give it a hair advantage.
I predict there is a good chance in the future, with the higher MP chips, that the need for the antialiasing filter is not as needed for my work most of the time. So I think more people will want their chips without that filter.
Just for fun, this last photo
 |
| This photo is the Fuji cropped more excellent than 1:1 but gave you the same part of the chart that the D750 was at 1:1 |
