Tips for Parents shooting sports

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Nikon D4, Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 with Sigma 1.4 converter, ISO 900, ƒ/5.6, 1/2000

I am so thankful I was covering this lacrosse game between The Citadel and Emory University this past Friday, rather than when it was first played. Initially, they had between 100 and 1,000 players on a much larger field and played for 2 to 3 days.

Wikipedia reports, “Lacrosse played a significant role in the community and religious life of tribes across the continent for many years. Early Lacrosse was characterized by deep spiritual involvement, befitting the spirit of combat in which it was undertaken. Those who took part did so in the role of warriors, to bring glory and honor to themselves and their tribes.”

Nikon D4, Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 with Sigma 1.4 converter, ISO 800, ƒ/5.6, 1/2000

Today, we celebrate our sporting victories with parties. In many ways, the money we spend on sports resembles the money we spend on religious events. Sportswriters even talk about the house of worship when referring to some venues. We have the call to worship with the national anthem, and we stand and cheer.

All this is to say, we love our sports.

The players in the game I covered are not on scholarships but rather play for the pure enjoyment of the game.

As I walked onto the field, I decided to shoot most of the match back-lit. I knew from years of shooting with the sun in their faces that often, the helmets would cast wicked dark shadows over their eyes. I wanted to see the sights.

Nikon D4, Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 with Sigma 1.4 converter, ISO 800, ƒ/5.6, 1/2000

The dynamic range spans from the brightest spot on their face to the darkest area, which is almost always the eyes. So by shooting on the shadow side, I just opened up a little. The other benefit was that the stands in the background were in the shade. This helped to pop the athletes out from the background.

Nikon D4, Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 with Sigma 1.4 converter, ISO 720, ƒ/5.6, 1/2000

Parents

So you bought a nice DSLR and a lovely lens that the camera store recommended to cover your child in sports. There are just a few tips to remember to make all your photos a lot better.

Get to the game early—this will give you time to scout out the best photo spots and get a feel for the lighting conditions at the field or court.

Get closer—Most parents could have saved a lot of money had they done what most pros do. Get out of the stands and get on the sidelines of the field. You may need permission, but this will improve your photos.

Shoot tight—While occasionally a looser shot can work, if it does, you still need to enlarge it to enjoy it more than the tight shots. Also, while you can crop later, photos shot with a longer lens and not cropped tend to look better, technically. One reason is that the uncropped idea is full resolution.

Use continuous shooting mode—This will allow you to take a rapid-fire series of photos, which can help capture fast-moving sports action.

Know the game—You need to understand the rules and what the point of the game is all about. This knowledge will help you locate the best place to capture those peak game moments.

Subscribe to sports magazines—Almost every sport has magazines with good examples of great images. Be familiar with the standard shots in the sport.

Nikon D4, Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 with Sigma 1.4 converter, ISO 640, ƒ/5.6, 1/2000. Note that even though this is an exciting moment, it does not compare to all the other photos here because it is loose.

Fast shutter speed—Your photos will be sharper and more in focus if you keep the shutter speed fast. I recommend 1/2000. This will minimize your camera movement and help freeze the athletes. If you read about shutter speed, many recommend 1/500. But if you got the light, shoot as high as possible.

Shallow Depth-of-Field—Photos shot at ƒ/2.8 or ƒ/4 will help clean up the background by throwing it out of focus. Yes, ƒ/16 will mean more photos are usable because everything is in direction. Refer to your Sports Illustrated Magazine photos to see what I mean.

Watch your backgrounds—Too often, busy and distracting backgrounds can ruin a great image. Sometimes you can’t do anything about it, but be sure you have tried.

Nikon D4, Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 with Sigma 1.4 converter, ISO 900, ƒ/5.6, 1/2000.

Show the competition—If you need a good action photo of your kid, take them to the field when there is no game, have them pose or play like they are playing, and get close. If you are shooting the game, take advantage of the other team. This is why they play: to compete. Take away the competition, and you lose the point of sports.

Edit your photos—After the game, take some time to review them and select the best ones. You can use editing tools to adjust the lighting, contrast, and color to make your photos look even better.

Share your photos with your child—Whether you post them on social media or print them out and put them in a photo album, make sure to share them with your child. They will love seeing themselves in action, which will be a great way to celebrate their hard work and dedication to their sport.

Shooting a photo package on a person

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Shooting a package

This is the bread-and-butter assignment for the editorial/photojournalist. You get a call from an editor who has a story about a person and wants some photos to accompany it.

While hanging out with a person for a week and picking the best images would be great, the budget is not there for those coverages. It is typical to talk with a subject about everything they are doing and stay focused on the story.

A health club’s national office contacted me and wanted me to show how their health club was helping people in the community live healthier lives since becoming involved with the club.

The environmental portrait

I photographed this engineering professor at Georgia Tech. We wanted to show that their clients have significant leadership positions in the community. I knew I needed something that read “Georgia Tech” quickly. Having the sign behind the professor was the thing to work.

I also photographed him at one of the icons for the campus, a steam engine located in the center of campus.

I also wanted to show you that I shot some available light, like this vertical shot. I also wanted you to see why using off-camera flash is so important, as I did in the first two photos. The off-camera flash separates my work from many GWCs [Guy With Camera].

At Work

I took several photos of the subject at work. Here, he is in a team meeting with colleagues. Others are also included in the slide show.

At the Gym

Dan Fisk & Trainer Keith Walker

I photographed the subject working out and turned in photos of each activity he did at the gym. Mind you, I shot hundreds of pictures and then had to go through them and eliminate all the ones where his face expressions were just not good or where something blocked a good view of his face.

By the way, to be sure these images were the best color, I used strobes in the gym to help with color, but also freeze him and get the sharpest images I could of him working out. Notice the detail in the instructor’s clothing, which is all black. That is the clue this was not available light.

Click on this to see larger.

I turned in the client 391 images in two folders: 1) Edits & 2) All the photos. They will probably only use three images: 1) portrait, 2) at-work shot, and 3) workout photo.  By shooting as many photos and narrowing them down to capture the best expressions and moments, I can give the art director choices, and they feel like they can have some variety to show in the end to their audience.

The contact sheet above shows just a minimal number of photos that I turned in. After eliminating all the blinks and funny expressions, I wanted you to see this. Hopefully, this will let you know how important it is to shoot enough photos to have a selection that shows off the subject in the best way possible.

Only Photography can capture the “Microexpressions”

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Microexpressions

 

Lie to Me is the hit TV [January 21, 2009 to January 31, 2011] series based on the research of Dr. Paul Ekman. Haggard and Isascs are credited with the discovery of Micro Expressions in the 1960s. Paul Ekman created a coding system for microexpressions and in 2001 he was named by the American Psychological Association as one of the most influential psychologists of the 20th century.

A microexpression is a brief, involuntary facial expression shown on the face of humans according to emotions experienced.  They are very brief in duration, lasting only 1/25 to 1/15 of a second. The 1/25 second was determined because back in 1960 this is how they slowed down a film that ran at 1/25 frame rate.

Even in the TV show Lie to Me you see that when a microexpression is detected they must investigate further, because one must not conclude that someone is lying if a microexpression is detected but that there is more to the story than is being told.

While some people are natural at seeing microexpressions many people learn how to detect them through training.  What is important it is much harder to detect a microexpression on people in person or within video.

The easiest tool to practice detecting micro expressions are photographs. So as you will see if you watch the TV show Lie to Me, which you can get on Netflix, is they use photographs to isolate and show the facial expressions.

The major emotions-how surprise, fear, anger, disgust, sadness, and happiness are registered by changes in the forehead, eyebrows, eyelids, cheeks, nose, lips, and chin. These help as there are not just one type of each expression. For example the emotion of surprise has many different expressions; questioning surprise, dumbfounded surprise, dazed surprise, slight, moderate, and extreme surprise. The intricacies of facial expressions are more easily read in photographs of how various emotions can blend or create different expressions.

Charles Darwin believed that facial expressions were universal. Through the years many have disagreed with Darwin.

Dr. David Matsumoto however agreed with Darwin basked on his research during the 2004 Olympics.  He studied both the sighted and blind Olympians during the 2004 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

What is important is how he conducted the research. He studied the thousands of photographs and compared the facial expressions of sighted and blind judo athletes, including individuals who were born blind. All competitors displayed the same expressions in response to winning and losing. So it is not something learned, but innate.


Take away

I believe that the power of the still image is because it can capture the microexpression that video cannot do. Sure you can argue that if you slow down video you can see a microexpression, but you are then trying to stop the video and thus creating a still image.

Today we can record up to 200 million frames per second, but the most common used high speed cameras record around 1000 frames per second. Television series such as MythBusters and Time Warp often use high-speed cameras to show their tests in slow motion.

We use these high speed cameras for seeking the truth and helping us scientifically build safer cars for example.

So if we want to understand something and get to the truth as in TV shows like MythBusters we must examine things in fractions of a second. This is where the still photographer has worked for decades.

My take away from all this about the microexpression is the the power of the photograph is it’s ability to freeze the moment for us to truly understand. For most people microexpressions are not controlled and therefore when we see these expressions tend to hold them as truthful moments.

It is important to point out that some people are born able to control their expressions (such as pathological liars), while others are trained, for example actors. “Natural liars” know about their ability to control microexpressions, and so do those who know them well. They have been getting away with things since childhood, fooling their parents, teachers, and friends when they wanted to.

Photojournalists are very aware of “The Decisive Moment” and what I believe is that microexpressions is more about that moment. This research and material published on microexpressions is great content for the photojournalist. Understanding microexpressions will make you a better photojournalist in my opinion.