Ever heard someone say that they would like to be a fly on the wall during that conversation? This means you would like to overhear the conversation as if you were not there. You want the situation to be accurate and not know you are there.
Being the Fly-on-the-wall also refers to the documentary style of photography where you work as unobtrusively as possible to capture those candid moments.
In the first photo, I captured the newest addition to our family. His older cousin and great-aunt are entertaining him and loving his reactions.
Body Language
I love this photo of the nieces and nephews getting measured to see who is taller while their aunt looks on. What makes this photo fun is that this isn’t all that is happening; you have the youngest boy being held by his mother and looking at me.
The body language tells the story that most likely happens during the holidays at many homes where the children are measured to see how much they have grown since last year.
Leaving some things out
You don’t need to see everything in a photo to work. Here the proud mother holding her child comes through clearly. Do you need to see all of the kids for it to work? I don’t think so. You may want more in the photo, and if you took it, you would include more. The strength of sometimes leaving something out makes you want to know what is going on. By leaving something out, you help pique the curiosity of the audience. Keep everything in, and often you lose that curiosity.
Details
So often, the small things around the holidays help tell our family story. For example, how often does your family talk about something grandmother cooks during the holidays? Do you have photos of this to pass along to your family?
My sister makes these rainbow cookies every year, so I thought I would document this for our family history. I keep talking about gathering our family recipes and creating a book. Now imagine this photo with a photo of the recipe card in the original family member’s handwriting that started the tradition. Maybe you have a picture of them as well on the page of the family book.
The Patriarch Speaks
Every year my dad likes to remind us how important family is to us. This year he read The Dash Poem by Linda Ellis. Here is a link to that poem if you want to make it part of your family tradition.
Crawling on the floor
Please don’t walk around the room and take all your photos from the standing position. Instead, get down to the little ones’ level as I did here. What happens when you are at eye level with the family’s baby? Well, the last time most of us saw things from this perspective was when we were just children.
When you get down on the ground, you help the audience feel like they did when they were children.
Have some fun
Here my daughter on the right with her friend is making music with Dan Cathy, the president of Chick-fil-A. He had these shakers with egg-shaped cow spots. During my daughter’s Christmas break, she had fun with her friends and Dan Cathy.
Where did you go?
We drove just a few miles from the grandparent’s house to where they filmed some of the Hunger Games.
You may recognize this photo as the baker’s shop.
Maybe you remember Katniss running here in this scene.
Holidays are about memories; here, my daughter is excited to be in front of the waterfalls where Katniss ran across.
How did you do with capturing your family this Christmas?
If you are still looking for a present for the photographer’s friend, consider a gift certificate for a workshop. If they don’t have one, give a VISA or AMEX gift card with a printout of the website to tell them you are giving them the funds to go to the workshop.
Difference between Photography Workshops/Seminars and College Programs
First, most photography workshops and seminars are held by working pros. Second, most college programs have people teaching who have academic credentials.
Some college programs do have working professionals teaching, but this is the primary advantage of a workshop and seminar. You can talk to the pros shooting for National Geographic Magazine or Sports Illustrated.
They will teach you tips for improving the use of your existing equipment, and their recommendations for new gear will help you make your next purchase.
I continue to attend workshops and help organize them. I just participated in the Atlanta Photojournalism Seminar earlier this month. That was an excellent refresher and a chance to talk to other pros doing what I am doing.
Advice to Students
If you are in a college program, you must attend a workshop or seminar to meet people in the industry. You may find an excellent place for an internship.
I have learned more in a week-long workshop doing nothing but photography than I did in college classes. One of the best reasons for this is that photography is all you do when you are there.
You don’t stop after an hour and then take an English and later a history class. You don’t work on other papers and projects at night unrelated to photography.
One of my favorite programs is the Youth With A Mission’s School of Photography. This 12-week photography program features guest speakers who give the students hands-on training.
Many of the students have gone on to create businesses in photography and have incorporated photography into other careers.
Tips to make the most of a workshop/seminar
Always have business cards. This allows you to share with the speakers and those in class.
Always have a portfolio with you. With iPads, Laptops, and photo books, you should not have your most recent portfolio to show for feedback and to help you grow.
Eat with the instructors if you can. Ask them if they have meal plans and take them to lunch. This will be your best investment ever. Ask questions and listen. Please don’t take them to lunch to tell them all about you.
Take notes.
Write down notes from speakers.
Audio record them if they will let you. Always ask first.
Take notes with your camera. (Again, ask)
Get to know as many of those in your class as possible. Sometimes, the people sitting next to you are just as valuable a resource as the teachers.
Cost-saving tips
Register earlier to take advantage of discounts.
Find the workshops’ social media pages. This is a great way to share rides or even rooms. Many college students can fit a few people into a hotel room and save money.
Find out if Nikon, Canon, or sometimes a camera store will provide free camera cleaning. They may limit the number of items they clean, but cleaning two cameras can save you $30 to $50 for each camera.
Try eating at the meeting space rather than driving for lunches and dinners. Many of the speakers eat right on-site to save time. You can pack a sandwich and get something small to sit at their table with other attendees.
Always let people with potential jobs in the area know you are going. If you go to a college, be sure to check to see if any of the sports teams are playing nearby. Going early or staying late may allow you to tag on a paying assignment, which will help lower your costs.
This is March 1 – 3, 2013, in Fort Worth, Texas. They still have some slots left for the student practicum from February 28 to March 1.
2-Minute Shows: The conference has a great opportunity that I don’t know any other seminar or conference offers. The first 45 to sign up can show their work to everyone in 2 minutes or less. This is a great tradition, and everyone loves seeing everyone’s work.
If you come to SWPJC and do not sign up for the 2-Minute Show, you will miss a great opportunity, especially if you are trying to get jobs or do this professionally in the long run.
My suggestion to any photographer who wants to be sure their loved ones know what they want for Christmas is to forward this email and suggest a workshop you might want to attend.
Photographers can learn a thing or two from other businesses. You go to just about any business and if you are receiving any services they are going to fill out some forms.
When you go to college they get all your information and put you into their system. Hospitals do the same thing and get information about where you live, phone numbers and most of all payment information.
When you get your car repaired the same thing happens. You will not get service before they gather information in most service providers.
Mistake Number One
When you get that first call from a new client there is a tendency to rush through your business practices. Your fear of loosing the client can cause you to miss some vital information which is done during the intake process.
You are setting the tone for the relationship going forward. The clients are generally understanding of you asking some questions to then later be able to give them a quote.
Create a form for new clients
One of the best things early in your career is to have a physical form you fill out so you can be sure you do not miss information which is critical to meeting their expectation and you getting paid.
Information you should get:
Contact Information
Name
Company Name
Mailing Address
Phone numbers
email
website
Project Details
Name for project
Deadlines
Usage Rights
How will it be used
What are the deliverables
JPEGs, RAW
CDs, DVDs or hard drive
Online Gallery
Prints
Contact Sheets
What is the style and approach for the project
Location
Contact names
Names of different people on project
Creative Director
Client contact
Location contact
Examples
Shot List
Sketches/Diagrams from Art Director
Information about location
Lighting
Crew (Will you provide or them)
These are just some of the things I often am asking for during my intake process. You may need to add some more or take something off, but either way having a physical list near your phone or on your computer that you can reference in the first contact will help you be successful.
The Power of Questions
For the most part each client that calls you will be getting a customized price for their needs. If you are just letting them choose from a price list you are more of a commodity and therefore not as service oriented as transaction based.
The accuracy of identifying the specific problem that the photography will help solve will give you a clear objective to meet.
When a new client calls and wants your price for doing head shots you can clarify how they will use them and how this helps their company. If the head shots are to be done of all their upper management to put on their website asking a few more questions can determine a more accurate pricing and meeting of their objective.
They may just want to show their people so when their clients call in they know who they are talking to or to expect when they come to them. This is more of an identification photo. However, lets say they are trying to help people get to know them to leverage themselves against their competition. The photos are to help them with branding and showing how personable they are as compared to the competition.
This is where maybe environmental portraits of their people not in their workspace, but rather with their hobbies may fit the bill better.
To get to the real problem being solved with photography requires some questions. Your questions maybe met with uncertainty. This is where you are helping them define their problem. You are also showing your expertise.
Mistake Number Two
Miscommunication is more common than anyone of likes, but it happens. The time to see if you were on the right track to meeting their objective is not when you are totally done.
Too many photographers forget that the best way to clarify the deliverable is with examples. If you have something you can send to them which is similar to what you plan to deliver then you are way ahead of the problem of miscommunication.
Take a moment once you have a good photo of the first thing you have and show them it. “Is this the right direction?,” is a great question. Often clients who have a lot to do will often leave once they see you are going the direction they want and let you take it from there.
If you have a number of locations on a job, take a moment and send them the first shots you can before continuing. I had a few photographers who I gave a series of subjects to photograph and the photographers shot a few of these over a few weeks and then sent me the results. They were not what I had asked them to do.
Mistake Number Three
Too many photographers shoot for themselves and not for the client. This shows up in a few ways to the client.
The photographer will crop the photographs to the way they like them. I have seen way too many photographers not paying attention to the way the client will use the photos.
The client needs the photos to put into a video. Most videos are designed to fit a TV screen. The photographers are providing squares or verticals which means there is a lot of black that will need to be used around the photos.
The client may need to put these in a layout of a publication that the client has approved of a specific layout design. If the photographer crops too much the photos become unusable.
The photographer also needs to provide several options for the client. Clients do not enjoy having just one photo that could work to have to use. Do your best to give the client a few options for any photo they need to use. Unless their are some pretty extreme circumstances preventing this, always make the effort to provide options.
Dialogue
While you may have some great questions you need to clarify their answers. You need to solicit their questions. The more you peel the onion of the assignment the closer you get to the core and meeting of those objectives.
While you may loose the bid to someone else, you are still auditioning for a future assignment. It is quite common that clients will use a friend or try to give someone a break and get burned. They will remember you as the one they should have gone with to do the job.
Jesus & Gloria say good-bye before the funeral service for their son Jesus Fonseca, Jr.
The recent events in Newtown, Connecticut have lit up social media and forums about how will we go forward and change.
Photojournalism
While photojournalists and journalists have trained to cover tragedy nothing truly prepares you for the actual event. An event can be gut wrenching and can trigger Post Traumatic Stress Disorder for the journalist. Even if the journalist doesn’t suffer long term from PTSD they are never the same after experiencing events like the school shooting in Newtown.
Often journalists are sent to cover events and because of the shock it is difficult for them to get their head around something when the emotions alone are making it so difficult to concentrate.
I believe one of the best things a journalist can do is to feel the situation I think too often in order to make it through an event journalists tend to try and shut down their emotions and cover the event logically.
Always ask yourself two questions whenever you pick up the camera:
Why am I taking this photograph?
What am I trying to say with this photograph?
If you shut down your emotions and not ask these questions truthfully you can end up traumatizing the subjects you photograph and your audience needlessly.
In the photo above I asked the family about covering the funeral for the Catholic Newspaper. They wanted to share their experience with the community. I wanted the community to experience the loss of the family. I wanted them to want to respond. For this audience praying for the family would be an appropriate expectation for the Catholic Newspaper.
In the lower photograph I was working at a small newspaper and shot this image. Showing the child getting out of the car for me was a relief. While you can see the mangled car you also see hope of the child being rescued by the man.
The best photos I make in these situations are when I feel my emotions and learn to help them guide me to help the readers experience what I am feeling. I also am careful not to needlessly shock for shock value.
Today’s News Media are young
The last few years the media has been laying off all the veterans and hiring younger and younger people to fill the roles of the journalists. The downside to this is many of them are covering some of their first traumatic events. Most all of them have not been trained like our military that goes through classes to help avoid PTSD.
If you find the journalists not quite sensitive, they might just be traumatized and having a difficult time themselves. Just look at how many journalists during 9/11 and just this week have broken down while covering the story.
Take a moment and pray for these journalists that they understand their role and are in touch with their emotions. Pray that they are asking what is the story and what are they trying to say so we stay informed.
This is just some of the damage to homes by Hurricane Sandy in Union Beach, New Jersey that I saw last week while covering a companies work there.
Ken is one of my mentors helping me with business practices.
My good friend and fellow photographer Ken Touchton, pointed out to me how we are called on day to day to cover the ordinary and make it look extraordinary.
Photographer’s on tour
The camera manufacturers and even our professional organizations often have photographers who create some cool photos doing their “dog and pony show” at seminars and workshops. Many of these photographers create these incredible images which help them to be professional speakers and lead workshops.
My hats off to these guys. They do an incredible job and create some outstanding images. The reality is that in my lifetime I will most likely have very few if any of these types of photo assignments.
Lately those photographers on tour are no longer using dogs and ponies. Now they have elephants, dancers and just find the most exotic people and places to capture. It does make sense that to have a great photograph start with great material.
It would be fun to have the budget to hire a few exotic animals, a few models and fly them all to an exotic location. I also think it would be cool to have all that equipment to light the subjects and make a truly memorable photo.
However, Ken and I are often called on by companies to tell the stories of normal every day folks doing what may visually appear to be mundane, but are truly extraordinary.
This is some of my coverage of Chick-fil-A cooking sandwiches that they do everyday and giving them to people in need.
Chick-fil-A has a food truck that they use to distribute sandwiches at large events. Here it is in Howell, NJ where they were distributing sandwiches to Hurricane Sandy victims, first responders and volunteers.
In total over four days, Chick-fil-A’s food truck produced and distributed 13,650 Chick-fil-A Sandwiches to folks in northern New Jersey and Staten Island.
Eddy Taylor from Chick-fil-A gives sandwiches to workers helping to clean up Union Beach, New Jersey. (Nikon D4, 14-24mm, Nikon SB-900 shot on TTL on camera on slow sync. Camera settings ISO 100, ƒ/8 and 1/250)
My objective was to capture Chick-fil-A personnel giving away sandwiches to those affected by Hurricane Sandy. When in a disaster I don’t get to scout the area and then plan which models to bring in for the photo shoot. I don’t get to come in and light the scene to make this pop as I might do in an advertising photo shoot. This is finding moments as they happen to tell a story. These moments were in short one to two minute intervals of the volunteers giving out sandwiches. It doesn’t take long to give them a sandwich and give a quick word of encouragement.
The hardest part of the coverage was showing people receiving sandwiches that you could tell by the visuals alone they were part of a disaster. I needed the food distribution and I needed to show this was about Hurricane Sandy. The photo above comes very close to communicating the two in the same photo.
(Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 100, ƒ/8 and 1/160)
One of my favorite photos from my coverage isn’t necessarily the best storytelling shot, but I love the motion of the Chick-fil-A personnel walking down the street of Union Beach, NJ where there is major damage. You can see all the debris stacked behind them that had to be cleared off the roads for vehicles to get into this neighborhood.
Chick-fil-A delivered free sandwiches to the Union Beach command post where they had setup a dining room in a tent to feed all the emergency responders. Here the State Troopers from all over the country are taking a lunch break. (Nikon D4, 14-24mm. Camera settings ISO 8000, ƒ/8 and 1/100 and AUTO White Balance)
Most of the time in disasters people are in the centers where people can come to get clothing, counseling or information about their homes. While the photo above of food being distributed to the first responders communicates the food distribution it lacks the context of Hurricane Sandy without some text.
While you can put a series of photos together on a page to help tie the communication package into a more cohesive package, the photojournalist is trying to do this with one photo, because often that is all the space they have.
Running and Gunning
In all of these photos I was what I call running and gunning. As a photojournalist I don’t stop people and ask them to do it again. You keep the camera up to your eye a lot of the time and quickly fire shots as they come up.
Now when I shoot for a company where we need certain things to look a certain way it is OK to make changes–it isn’t photojournalism it is advertising or corporate communications. However, my photojournalism background helped me stay focused during my coverage. Chick-fil-A was on a timetable of delivering these sandwiches to people in less than 20 minutes.
They know that food safety is important and also gives the customer the best experience. If you look closely you will notice they are on the move in giving these sandwiches out to people.
(Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 100, ƒ/5 and 1/500 No Flash)
I wanted to show how at times the photojournalist will use on camera flash in a fast moving situation to help hold some of the shadow details. In the photo above I was believing this would work OK since the skin tones of the people getting sandwiches was light. When the darker skinned volunteers came up and they were all backlit I didn’t want to risk not seeing their faces so I put on the Nikon SB 900 and using the high speed sync mode and slow-sync was able to pop a little fill flash ensure I was capturing people’s faces.
Another side note you can see how I altered the frame in the two photos. I don’t need multiple shots with just the people changing, I wanted to tell more about the location, but had no time to move around. I just composed to show how the devastation to the left of the house was there in the second photo.
By the way we were in this location for less than five minutes. We had hot sandwiches that needed to be delivered to more places.
(Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 100, ƒ/5 and 1/500 with Nikon SB-900 on camera fill flash on slow-sync)
The Results
You might wonder how all this went for Chick-fil-A. Here is one person’s response to the call center for Chick-fil-A:
Customer Comments: The customer stated that he and his family are
survivors of Hurricane Sandy. He stated that the Howell Restaurant
delivered Chicken Sandwiches to people in his area. He informed me that
the Red Cross has not even made it into his area yet but Chick-fil-A has
come two times. He and his family really appreciate the gesture.
It is due to all my training as a photojournalist that companies need me. They cannot turn the hurricane disaster coverage into an advertising location photo shoot. They need a photographer that can in any situation come away with photos that communicate.
Ken Touchton and I are going to the Atlanta Photojournalism Seminar next week the first weekend in December. It is their 40th anniversary and Ken was there 40 years ago. I am also one of the organizers for the Southwestern Photojournalism Seminar that is March 1 – 3, 2012. Both of these are great places to learn from storytellers and ask them how they handle situations.
Many of the speakers are photojournalists who also shoot commercially. Maybe the reason some of them make great advertising photographers is they know what looks authentic and have a knack for helping creating those impactful moments.
I still advise anyone starting in this industry to try and get a job with a small town newspaper. The experience gained from shooting day to day assignments will help you know how to get the best possible photo in any situation. It will also help you appreciate the ability to plan and do preproduction to get those advertising shots where you are in control.
The magazine publishing my pictures requires images to be at least 300 ppi. How do I change the resolution to 300 ppi?
Editorial Note: DPI (or dots per inch) is commonly accepted but not technically correct. It refers to the resolution of output devices such as laser or inkjet printers, plate setters, or film imagesetters. For accuracy, we will use the term PPI (or Pixels Per Inch).
I’m often asked this question based on misunderstandings, and I hope we can clarify them in this newsletter.
First of all, you rarely need to do anything. They request an image with a resolution of 300 PPI when printed to a specific size. A request for 300 PPI or any ppi without any associated width and height dimensions of the print is nonsense—the dimensions of the print need to be known.
The Formula:
Width x 300 = a Height x 300 = b
Multiply a times b to determine the minimum size of a megapixel camera needed to make the photo.
Here’s an example for an 8 x 10-inch print. Width 8 x 300 ppi = 2400. Height 10 x 300 ppi = 3000.
You need an image that is at least 2400 x 3000 pixels. Multiply 2400 x 3000 to get 7,200,000 pixels or 7.2 megapixels. Now we know the minimum size of the megapixel camera needed, but how do we change the resolution? Photoshop to the rescue…. again.
The dialogue to change the PPI-number in Photoshop is Image->Image Size. When you choose it, you get a dialogue box like the one in Example 1. Be sure the Resample Image checkbox is left unchecked. This prevents accidentally throwing away pixels that will diminish the quality of the image.
The Image Size box is a resolution calculator. Your camera manufacturer has a default setting, such as 72 ppi. In this example, the default setting is 240. Remember that you can change this to 300 ppi, which tells you the maximum size print you can make with this image. As long as the Resample Image checkbox is unchecked, you will not accidentally damage your image.
Take a look at Example 2. You can see that the Resample Image box is unchecked, and the Resolution was changed to 300 ppi. Note: The width and height remain the same for the Pixel Dimensions. The actual image didn’t change. You now have a calculator that tells you the print size you can make at any ppi.
There are many different output devices. Let’s look at printers. Canon and HP desktop inkjets are usually optimized at 600 ppi, while Epson’s are 720 ppi. The Fuji Frontier, used in many minilabs, is generally optimized for 300 ppi; some laser jet printers offer a choice between 200 ppi and 400 ppi. You should refer to the manufacturer’s specifications or ask the lab to determine the optimum resolution for a specific printer.
Please know the best PPI for your printer to determine the most significant print size you can make. Just be sure the size image is not larger than your printer’s quality capabilities. You want it large enough, but there is a slight chance it can be too big. An often forgotten aspect of quality prints is the distance from which the prints will generally be viewed. The viewing distance changes everything. You do not need a 300 ppi image to produce a billboard. You only need about 6000 total pixels for a Billboard.
The chart below can help you make display prints for trade shows or places where you need large images.
Determining PPI by Viewing Distance
To determine an optimal PPI (resolution in Photoshop) for a photo, the calculation is as follows:
7000 / viewing distance in inches = PPI
This is for optimal results. Using half that number will still provide good-quality results. If you do anything lower, you will begin to sacrifice image quality.
A Quick Chart for Determining PPI by Viewing Distance
Under 24 inches = 300 PPI
24″ to 36″ = 200 PPI
36″ to 60″ = 120 PPI
5′ to 10′ = 60 PPI
10′ to 20′ = 30 PPI
Billboard = 10 to 20 PPI
I hope this information about PPI, image size, viewing distance, and printer capabilities has been helpful to you. Nothing is EVER simple.
I get this question all the time: “How much should I charge for my photography?”
I teach classes that help students understand pricing each year. I’ve noticed that many students simply copy each other’s numbers instead of doing the math for themselves, which is a big mistake.
There are a few dangerous myths about pricing your work. Let’s break them down.
Myth #1: Everyone’s Situation Is the Same
People say they know everyone’s situation is different, but then they go online, see what others charge, and copy those prices.
Here’s a typical example: A new wedding photographer sees that most people in the area charge $2,500 per wedding. They look at what’s included—prints, a photo book, maybe an online gallery—and figure, “I can do all that and still make money,” so they charge the same amount.
They often don’t realize those photographers may be losing money or barely breaking even. Learning whether your pricing works takes time (and frequently a few financial hits).
Hawaii Tropical Botanical Garden
Myth #2: Better Work = Higher Prices
Many photographers think that the better your work, the more you can charge. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work like that in the real world.
Let me explain it with a business concept: Return on Investment (ROI)
Here’s the formula:
ROI = (Net Profit / Investment Cost) × 100
Example: If you spend $1,000 on marketing and make $1,500, your ROI is 50%. You earned 50 cents for every dollar you spent.
In photography, better quality doesn’t always lead to better ROI. A real-world example: Sports teams often need basic photos for websites or media guides. A high school doesn’t need a Sports Illustrated-level photo—they need one that works. The incredible image might be admired, but it won’t necessarily generate more revenue for the school.
Even at the professional level, the value of a photo often depends more on who’s in it than how technically perfect it is. A great action shot of an MVP might sell. The same quality image of a benchwarmer? Probably not.
So yes, quality matters—but it’s not the only thing that matters.
Honu’apo Bay, The Big Island of Hawaii
Myth #3: New Photographers Should Charge Less
I hear this mostly from students: “I’m still in school, so I should charge less.”
But here’s the truth: Clients look at your work first, not your resume. They’ll hire you if they like what they see and your price fits their budget.
The only time being a student matters is when the client is looking for a bargain and thinks hiring a student is a way to save money.
Experience does help in some cases. But sometimes clients prefer a fresh perspective over someone with decades of experience. There’s room for both.
Clients really care about whether your photos look like what you say you can deliver.
So… What’s Your Situation?
Before you can price your work correctly, you need to know where you stand and what you want.
Here are the three main types of photographers:
1. Hobbyist
You love photography but don’t plan to make it a career.
Some hobbyists fund their gear and give away photos just for fun or access.
Others try to offset the equipment cost by charging a little for their work.
2. Part-Time Photographer
You have a primary job but shoot gigs on the side.
Teachers who shoot weddings in the summer.
Professionals who do editorial work in their field, like scientists contributing to National Geographic.
3. Full-Time Photographer
You make your living entirely from photography.
If you want to move from hobbyist or part-time to full-time, you must price accordingly.
Balloon Ride in North Georgia
Want to Go Full-Time? Here’s How to Start
If you’re serious about going full-time, you need to do three things:
Know Your Budget. Use tools like Excel’s “Household Budget” or free resources like Kiplinger’s online budget worksheet: http://www.kiplinger.com/tools/budget/
Know Your Business Expenses. It all adds to gear, insurance, marketing, software, and subscriptions.
Estimate Your Workload. How many shoots do you think you’ll realistically book in a year? Start small and base your estimates on real jobs you’ve already done, even on the side.
Once you have those three numbers—your budget, business costs, and potential jobs—you can figure out what you need to charge to go full-time.
Myth #4: “I’ll Figure It Out Later”
Many photographers tell themselves they’ll figure out pricing once they’re “ready.” But that kind of thinking can delay or even sabotage your success.
Here’s a little secret: Many full-time photographers don’t create mind-blowing work. So, how do they stay in business?
They know their numbers. They understand what it costs to run their business and what they need to earn. They stick to their pricing and don’t discount out of fear. They don’t work for free or less than cost.
When you’ve done the math, you’ll have the confidence to say, “This is my price.” And you’ll know you’re running a sustainable business, not just chasing your passion.
Which kind of photographer are you today? And more importantly, where do you want to go?
Pricing isn’t just about numbers. It’s about clarity, confidence, and building the kind of career—or hobby—you want.
“Hey can you take some photos of our band for a promo shot?” Was the request from Late Night Reading’s drummer Drew Cottrell.
Earlier I took some pictures of the band when they were in town a couple of months ago. Here is the blog post I did then. What I wrote about back then was that even the D4 was struggling to take photos in a dark hole like the Swayze’s Venue in Marietta, GA.
I had in my van my monobloc lighting kit this time in addition to the Nikon Speedlights.
I went into the parking lot a little later after they had played and set up my lights. I also asked them if they had something they were looking for. They didn’t have any ideas, so I took the lead and told them about this concept you see above.
Here is the setup for the photo.
Now lets play
Once I have the lights set and get a few of the shots that I was initially looking for, I asked the band to have some fun.
I then took the same setup and moved it to where you could see the Tatoo Shop and the Pawn Store lights in the background. Here are some of those shots.
For these I used a tripod and dragged the shutter to 1/13th of second. Everything else stayed the same since there was almost no light on the band.
I would prefer to shoot the promo photos all the time over the concert photos. Just compare these above to the same band performing below.
Live Performance
Nikon D4, 14-24mm ƒ/2.8, ISO 6400, 1/60, ƒ/4
The strobes are on the PocketWizard Transceiver TT5 and They are on Manfrotto 5001B Nano Black Light Stands and the Manfrotto 175F Justin Spring Clamp with Flash Shoe to hold the flashes. I am triggering the TT5 using the PocketWizard Mini TT1 and PocketWizard AC3.
I turned the ISO up to about ISO 6,400 because I didn’t want the background to go totally dark.
Nikon D4, 14-24mm ƒ/2.8, ISO 6400, 1/60, ƒ/4
Nikon D4, 28-300mm ƒ/3.5-5.6, ISO 10,000, 1/60, ƒ/5.6
While these are pretty good for shooting in a dark hole, I still prefer having the control I had with the studio strobes and moving the band members around.
My friend Zach Arias launched his successful freelancing business just shooting bands like Late Night Reading’s promo shots. He started by just using a Vivitar 285 on a light stand. He was so successful he started a workshop teaching photographers his “One Light” technique.
Today I shot a volleyball game with just available light. I was pleasantly surprised at how nice the quality of the images were for shooting under sodium vapor lights.
The Nikon D4 is something I wish I had back in the 1980s. During those years I was shooting sports every week for the daily newspaper that I worked back then. Now I only occasionally shoot sports.
While the Nikon D4 has the high ISO capabilities the new technology of vibration reduction also contributes to the photos being sharper than I can remember.
Nikon D4, 70-200 ƒ/2.8, ISO 12,800, 1/800, ƒ/4
White Balance Setting
To insure I got the best skin tones possible, I used the ExpoDisc. I put the ExpoDisc over the lens and pointed it towards the lights in the gym. I also slowed the shutter speed to 1/100 to be sure I was not catching the lights during a cycle. After doing this for both of the Nikon D4 cameras, I cranked the shutter speed preference in the Auto ISO settings to 1/2000.
Nikon D4 Exposure Settings
Aperture Priority
Auto ISO
Lowest ISO 100
Highest ISO 12,800
Shutter Preference 1/2000
I also was using the Vibration Reduction on the lens to help improve sharpness due to handholding the lens.
Nikon D4, 70-200 ƒ/2.8, ISO 12,800, 1/1250, ƒ/4
With the Nikon D4 you also have auto focus setting as well to choose from.
Auto Focus Setting for the Nikon D4
Continuous Auto Focus
21 Grouping
Kept it centered and locked it
Focus Tracking on Long
Shutter on C-H 10fps
Nikon D4, 120-300 ƒ/2.8, ISO 12,800, 1/1000, ƒ/5.6
My Favorite Angle
This is my favorite angle for shooting volleyball. However, the one thing I would have loved even more was to shoot from a slightly higher angle. The reason for this would help me keep the net from trying to refocus my lens.
Why I like this angle is I can show the team I am covering. You can see their face expressions and while I cannot see the other teams faces, I can see the competition in the body language.
The good thing in shooting up a the players is it gives them this Greek gods feel. I like athlete looking like they are bigger than life. Shooting up at them helps to create this feel.
There you have it, my settings and secret weapon, the Nikon D4.
Caption: Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 12,800, ƒ/5.6, 1/400 — Flashes used (4) Alienbees B1600 with 11″ long throw reflectors with PocketWizard Plus II receivers and being triggered by the PocketWizard Mini TT1. with DXO Pure RAW 4 & Lightroom
High-Speed Flash vs. No Flash
In the photo above, I used a flash with an output about the same as the existing light.
This is the histogram for the above photo.
Nikon D4, 120-300mm, ISO 11,400, ƒ/2.8, 1/1000 with DXO Pure RAW 4 & Lightroom
Here is another photo without strobes. I had to change to a faster lens and use a faster shutter speed.
This is the histogram for the second photo. Two things stand out. First, the shadows in the picture using available light have less information than the photo using flash. Second, the entire dynamic range appears more significant with the flash, resulting in less photo noise.
ISO 25,600
I wanted to see what the Nikon D4 looked like at 25,600 without strobes. Here is the result. I am showing the same player, so there is a slight variation as possible except for ISO.
Nikon D4, 120-300mm, ISO 25,600, ƒ/4, 1/1250 processed with DXO Pure RAW 4 & Lightroom
Here is the histogram for ISO 25,600
Color Temperature
A camera’s ability to accurately reproduce color depends greatly on the color space with which the object is photographed. The dynamic range of color is the greatest with Daylight or 5500º Kelvin. As you move away from this color temperature to the sodium vapor lights in this gym, which are 3700º Kelvin, and then you must add 27+ magenta to color correct this to get a neutral grey, the color space shrinks. The dynamic range is less.
If we had used only the strobes and no ambient light for the most accurate color, the color would have been the most accurate. Also, I could not have bounced the flashes off the ceiling; I would have had to point them straight at the volleyball players. The bounced flash will shift the color of whatever it bounces off. If the ceiling were red, there would be a red tent to the light.
Setup
Here is a photo of one of the four Alienbees B1600 with the 11″ long throw reflectors. You can also see the PocketWizard Plus II used to trigger the flash. I dialed down the flash output to 1/8 power. Again, with today’s full-framed high ISO camera chips, the results are quite acceptable, and the flash is less disturbing to those in the room.
This is a wider shot of the room where you can see the results of all four strobes going off.
This is the histogram for the overall shot above.
Agnes Scott vs Huntingdon
Here is that same angle with no flashes.
This is the histogram for the available light photo.
One last comparison
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 12,800, ƒ/5.6, 1/400 — Flashes used with DXO Pure RAW 4 & LightroomNikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 12,800, ƒ/5.6, 1/400 — No Flash with DXO Pure RAW 4 & Lightroom
High-Speed Flash Sync
You may have noticed that the flash shots were taken with studio strobes and synced faster than the Nikon D4’s 1/250 sync speed. How did I do that?
Here is an explanation from the PocketWizard website.
PocketWizard’s HyperSync™ feature throws x-sync out the window, allowing never before possible shutter speeds with full power flash – any full power flash. With some camera and flash combinations even 1/8000th second is possible. (Alienbees with the Nikon would only sync up to 1/400)
HyperSync is simply the ControlTL® system’s unique ability to adjust the timing of the flash burst so that you can use as much of the light output as possible as the shutter opening passes over your sensor. With the systems “through-the-shoe” communication, a ControlTL transmitter with HyperSync can automatically detect the camera type connected to it as well as the shutter speed. Read more …
First, the LCD on most modern digital cameras and cell phones is pretty big. Compare that screen to the little eyepiece on the Nikon P7000 above, and at first glance, you might prefer using it over the viewfinder.
You can display more information on the LCD than on the viewfinders. I have the camera set for Aperture Priority here due to the big “A” in the left-hand corner. You can also see the ISO of 100, 1/1, and ƒ/4. In addition to these settings, you can see the histogram, the flash is turned off, the vibration reduction is on, and the infrared remote is turned on.
Also, you can see the JPEG setting is on FINE JPEG. Next to it, the size of the image is set to the highest for this camera, which is 10 Meg.
As you can see in this photo of me using the LCD, I must keep the camera a reasonable distance from my face.
LCD Disadvantages
Holding the camera still this far out isn’t easy. I guess you now know why almost all point-and-shoot cameras now have vibration reduction. It is trying to compensate for the above-average camera shake compared to the viewfinder.
Now, using the viewfinder, the camera is next to my eye.
I can now use my two hands and my head as a tripod. I push the camera next to my head, which will help steady the camera. When you do that, your pictures will be sharper because you are less prone to shaking the camera.
My Nikon D4 also has an LCD like the Nikon P7000, but photographers rarely use it to shoot still images.
When you are outside, it is tough to see the LCD in bright sunlight. I prefer the viewfinder.
Viewfinder Advantages
You can use your body as a tripod since you can now steady the camera on your head.
I can see in any situation
On most DSLR cameras, all the information on the LCD is in the viewfinder
Viewfinder Disadvantages
If you want to take a photo above at a bird’s l, you cannot see what you are doing, and the LCD will help you know what the camera is seeing. This is also true from the perspective of a low worm’s eye.
Conclusion
Neither the viewfinder nor LCD works for every situation. I would always want both on any camera I buy from now on.
Let me start with the client’s email to me the morning after the event. Yes, I deliver quickly.
The pictures are great. I really love the clarity; especially those that are up close. Please send me an invoice so I can submit payment.
thanks again!!
When I cover a party, I have a mental shot list. As I work through the list, I notice that I become increasingly relaxed as I tick off each item.
I have learned over time to cover an event in phases, which allows me to ensure I have the “safe” shots, and then I can gradually add the photos that enhance the package.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2800, ƒ/4, 1/100
Phase One
Arrive early and start taking photos of the location. Most likely, the hosts have spent a little money on the food, and the caterer has done their best within the budget to present their best.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 5600, ƒ/4.8, 1/100Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 5600, ƒ/5, 1/100Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 4500, ƒ/5.3, 1/100Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 6400, ƒ/5, 1/100
Arriving early also allows you to have more space to work. No one is there, and this gives you the ability to back up, move closer, and change your angle to get what you like for representing the food.
All the food shots I took were done with available light. I am not trying to be on the cover of Southern Living Cookbook, so I am not shooting the photos at the lowest ISO and lighting the food to make it look its very best. My purpose is to show the food as it looked for the event.
I try to use available light as much as feasible. All the food shots were done with available light.
Phase Two
I work the room, trying to get photos of the people interacting. During this time, I might use some flash to fill in the shadows. I want to be sure the images are solid and not me pushing the limits of the situation, which might not work.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 3200, f/5.6, 1/80, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 3200, f/5.6, 1/80, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome.
As you can see, this is where I might have the guest pose for a photo. I am encouraging them to get closer to one another. Now, if they do not want to get too close, I capture them with a bit of space, or when they want to show a true friendship, you might see them holding on to each other.
I try to shoot these just a little loose for two reasons. First, if you shoot too tight and they want an 8×10 print, then they may not have enough excess to crop the photo from the long side. The same can be true for a 5×7, except in this case, there isn’t enough from the short side to crop. Keeping it loose allows for different dimension prints.
Second, I like to show the environment. I believe this is one of the most significant mistakes made by amateurs. They come in so close that the pictures no longer have any context. Whose party are they attending anyway?
Why Flash?
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 900, ƒ/5.6, 1/100, and no flashNikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 500, f/5.6, 1/80, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome. They are outside on a porch with an overhang and a white ceiling.
During the second phase, I occasionally shoot available light and then quickly add a flash. The reason is that the flash will help fill in the shadows. With darker skin, there is a tendency to lose the facial details if you are not careful. Notice the difference in the skin tones of the lady’s face, and you will see how the lower photograph is technically superior. I prefer the expression in the first photo and wish I had had the flash on for that shot; then it would have been perfect for my taste.
As one who is always advocating for removing the flash from the camera, unless the budget allowed for a photo assistant to walk around with my flash, the guests would most likely bump into a light stand and possibly get hurt, or damage my gear. I used a camera flash for this event. However, I did bounce it and never shot with it directly pointed at the subjects.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 12800, ƒ/5.6, 1/60, and no flashNikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 4000, f/3.5, 1/500, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 400, f/4.8, 1/80, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2500, f/4, 1/250, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 800, f/5.6, 1/125, and Nikon SB-900 bouncing off the ceiling with no diffusion dome.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 1000, ƒ/5.6, 1/100 and no flash.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2500, ƒ/5.6, 1/100 and no flash.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 3600, ƒ/5.6, 1/100 and no flash.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2000, ƒ/5.6, 1/200, and no flashNikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2000, ƒ/5.6, 1/125 and no flashNikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 3200, ƒ/5.6, 1/100 and no flash
Notice in these two photos that I have switched to an ultra-wide-angle lens, the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. I love shooting with this lens to help give context and put the viewer in the scene, as if they are standing right there on the porch and part of the conversation.
Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 1000, ƒ/5.6, 1/200, and no flash
Notice in the photo below that I went just a little wider than the one above. The one above is shot at 24mm, and the one below is shot at 19mm. I love seeing the three women in the back in three different conversations. You can tell everyone is enjoying themselves and having moments of their own.
Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 2000, ƒ/5.6, 1/200 and no flash
Using the 28-300mm lens, I can zoom in, as I have done below with the photo of the person listening to another. This was zoomed to 300mm, allowing me to look across the room, just like you would if you were there to catch glimpses of others enjoying conversations.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2000, ƒ/5.6, 1/250 and no flash
You need some overall shots to capture the number of people who attended the event. This is everyone gathering for a few comments at the cocktail party. I shot it with the Nikon 14-24mm @ 14mm to capture as much of the room as possible. I am holding the camera as high as I can above my head and angling it down to show the room, almost as if it were a security camera positioned in the corner of a room.
Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 2200, ƒ/5.6, 1/10,0 and Nikon SB-900 bounced with no diffuser.Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 2500, ƒ/5.6, 1/200, and Nikon SB-900 bounced without the diffuser.Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2000, ƒ/5.6, 1/125 and no flash
Phase Three
Usually, there is a point at which I have photographed most everyone in the room a few times. I have the event covered if I were to stop working. This is where I am now free to start looking for more interesting photos.
Now in Phase Two, I did some of these photos, but this is where I look for moments and may push the limits of the situation. A good example is shooting with the Nikon 28-300mm zoomed to 300mm, shooting available light. Even at ISO 12800, you may need to use a slow shutter speed indoors.
I did this, but I had to discard a lot of the photos because of camera movement or because the subject moved. It would be common for the subject to start laughing and toss their head back in the process, and I get a blur and nothing is sharp. This is why I often wait to do these shots in Phase Three, but I might mix a few in Phase Two.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 2000, ƒ/5.6, 1/160, and Nikon SB-900 bounced with no diffusion.
Since I had pretty much everything the client needed, it was easier to meet the chef’s request for a photo of himself towards the end. I could have done this in Phase One, but he was swamped at the time.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 5000, ƒ/5.6, 1/100, and no flashNikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 4500, ƒ/5.6, 1/100, and no flash
With the photo of the man in the center and the people around the table, I moved a little back and forth until I used him to block the light behind him. This is the president of Georgia Tech talking to the new tenured professors.
Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 11400, ƒ/5.6, 1/100, and no flash
In the photo below, you can see the dining room from above. Hopefully, this gives you a reason to arrive early to take pictures of the food. Where do you stand on getting those photos now?
Nikon D4, 14-24mm, ISO 10000, ƒ/5.6, 1/100 and no flash
In the following two photos, notice the slow shutter speeds and high ISO settings. The top photo was shot at 250mm and the lower one at 210mm. Either of these would generally be shot at a minimum shutter speed of 1/250 to ensure there is no camera movement. In the lower photo, I am shooting at a shutter speed of 1/40. While I can do everything to capture this moment, ideally, all it takes is for the lady to move slightly, and it becomes a blur. This is why I shoot this type of photo without a flash and ISO 12800 in Phase Three. I am taking larger risks. If I did this in Phase Two, the number of photos I would be giving the customer would shrink drastically.
Nikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 8000, ƒ/5.6, 1/10,0 and no flashNikon D4, 28-300mm, ISO 12800, ƒ/5.6, 1/40 and no flash
The Seasoned Pro
It takes years to master this technique truly. Besides dividing up types of photos, I am also pushing the limits of the flash and available light.
Shooting the way I did for this event is quite complex, but the results, I think, speak for themselves. I guess I capture genuine moments with minimal intrusion. This is why clients hire me – not just because they need a photographer. They need a photographer who will come in and not complain about the lack of light, thereby creating problems.
Before my client even saw these photos, they were excited to invite me back. They liked how I worked; that’s what they commented to me as I left. If it is that evident that they see a difference in how I work compared to other photographers, and they haven’t even seen the results, then I know it is my years of experience showing in how I carry myself.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.