|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
A podcast conversation recently got me thinking about a 1983 magazine tip. Two researchers laughed about a hair-care trick one of them still follows 40 years later because she read it in a 1983 magazine. The tip was cold water to close the cuticles. The point wasn’t the hair. It was how one confident, repeatable tip can lodge in your brain for decades without anyone checking whether it’s true.
Photographers do this constantly, and it goes well beyond what we buy.
Why bad advice sticks
The conversation was on The Curiosity Shop with Brené Brown and Adam Grant. They pointed to research from Robert Cialdini and Brad Sagarin showing that resisting persuasion takes two things at once. You have to admit you’re vulnerable to it, and you have to know how to take a message apart. Either one alone isn’t enough.
They also noted that ideas stick when they’re simple, concrete, emotional, and wrapped in a story, which describes nearly every photography video on YouTube. Sticky and true are different things. Over time, we forget who told us something and keep only the message (psychologists call it the sleeper effect). So the claim you picked up from a stranger two years ago now feels like your own conviction.
Fear sharpens all of this. The hook, the confident authority, and the missing evidence work best on someone who already feels behind.
Gear: the obvious trap
Gear acquisition syndrome is the version everyone recognizes. The pitch sounds like “you can’t be a serious photographer without this body,” or “this lens is the secret,” or “if you’re not mirrorless you’re obsolete.” Add affiliate links, sponsored reviews, and ambassador deals, and the person recommending the product often profits when you buy it.
A famous photographer is an authority on making pictures. That doesn’t make them an authority on whether you need a $2,000 lens. One person’s opinion is the weakest kind of evidence. Independent testing, side-by-side comparisons on your own work, and long-term use by working photographers with no financial stake are all stronger.
The bigger issue: how we shoot
This is where I think the real damage happens. We don’t only absorb gear opinions from influencers. We absorb methods, rules, and attitudes toward the people in front of our cameras.
- “Always shoot wide open.” “Never crop.” “Get closer or you’re not trying.” Absolute rules stick because they’re simple, but they reflect one photographer’s preferences, built for one kind of work.
- Techniques designed for a staged portrait or a travel reel get applied to a funeral, a hospital room, or a family on the worst day of their year.
- “Get the shot” culture rewards engagement over care. Viral content often depends on what a subject didn’t consent to or couldn’t refuse.
- Whole communities form around shared enemies (the wrong brand, the wrong style, the “fake” photographers). That sense of belonging feels good, and questioning the group feels disloyal.
Photography with vulnerable people carries real responsibility. The NPPA Code of Ethics asks for respect and dignity toward subjects and special consideration for those who are vulnerable. That standard doesn’t come from an algorithm, and an influencer optimizing for views is rarely the one holding you to it.
Principles first, personalities second
Most photographers I respect learned from many voices, but they filtered everything through a short list of principles they could name. Mine look something like this:
- Do I treat the person in front of me as a person? Technique serves the relationship, not the other way around.
- Is this true? Honest representation of the moment, the place, and the people.
- Would my subject be comfortable seeing how I got this picture?
- Does this serve the story, or only my image?
When you know what you value, an influencer’s advice becomes input to test. Without that, it becomes instruction.
Source tips: a quick filter for any photographer you follow
1. Own your vulnerability first. Notice which fears you’re easiest to sell to: falling behind, looking amateur, not being “pro” enough. Decide in advance what you’ll do when someone presses those buttons.
2. Separate what they show from what they claim. You can test a demonstrated technique yourself. You can’t test a claim that you need something by watching a video.
3. Ask who benefits. Is this sponsored? Is there an affiliate link? Does their business depend on you believing it? That doesn’t make them wrong, but it tells you how hard to check.
4. Look for evidence beyond their say-so. Independent tests, working pros with no stake, and your own side-by-side results all count more than a confident voice.
5. Check the track record where it matters. Someone excellent at landscapes may have nothing useful to say about photographing grieving families. Match the source to the situation.
6. Check how they treat their subjects. Watch how they work with people. Do they ask permission? Do they explain what they’re doing? Their conduct shapes their credibility.
7. Trace your own beliefs back to their source. When you catch yourself saying “everyone knows you should…”, ask who told you and when. If you can’t remember, hold the belief more loosely.
8. Wait 48 hours before acting. Before buying anything or adopting a new rule, write down where the idea came from. If it still holds up after two days and a little digging, go ahead.
9. Seek out people who disagree. If everyone you follow agrees, you’re in an echo chamber. Add a few trusted voices that challenge you.
10. Keep a few real mentors. Learn from people whose work and conduct you’ve been able to observe over time, not just in clips.
Listen, learn, and stay skeptical
None of this means ignoring influencers. Many are generous teachers and can show you things you’d never find on your own. The goal is to keep your own judgment in the room. Learn from everyone, trust slowly, and let your principles, not the algorithm, decide what ends up in your camera bag and how you treat the people in your viewfinder.
