What Music Taught Me—and What Many Photographers Are Missing

Reading Time: 3 minutes

When I was playing trumpet in school, there was no confusion about where I stood.

We challenged for chairs. First chair, second chair, third chair. Everyone knew their place because we had to prove it. You didn’t get a chair by confidence or by opinion—you earned it by playing better than the person next to you.

And more importantly, you listened.

You listened to the conductor. You listened to the ensemble. You listened to your teacher. If you didn’t, the music fell apart—and everyone knew it.

In college, I became a better trumpet player and found myself surrounded by even better musicians. That environment was humbling, but it was also clarifying. I remember learning Haydn’s Trumpet Concerto. I worked hard, learned the notes, played them cleanly, and brought them to my teacher.

When I finished, he said something I’ve never forgotten:

“Now you’re ready to learn how to play it.”

That moment taught me a lesson that has shaped my entire career, both in music and in photography.

Technical competence is only the beginning.

In music, technical mastery is the price of admission—not the goal.

You don’t get praised for hitting the notes. You get invited into expression, phrasing, tone, and interpretation after you’ve proven you can handle the basics. No one confuses competence with mastery.

Photography, however, often does.

Modern cameras have removed many technical barriers. Autofocus is incredible. Exposure is forgiving. The tools are accessible—and that’s a gift. But it’s also created a dangerous illusion: that making something look “good” means you’ve arrived.

In music, you’d never assume that.

Photography lacks the structure that forms humility

One of the most significant differences between music and photography is structure.

Music has:

  • Auditions
  • Chairs
  • Conductors
  • Ensembles
  • Clear standards
  • Immediate consequences

Photography often has:

  • Likes
  • Followers
  • Algorithms
  • Self-appointed mentors

There’s no equivalent of chair challenges in photography. No conductor to submit to. No ensemble that collapses when one person is out of time or out of tune. Because of that, many photographers never learn to listen—only to assert.

And when you don’t have to listen, you don’t have to grow.

The problem isn’t confidence—it’s formation

This isn’t about ego. It’s about formation.

In music, you are formed by critique. You are shaped by people who are better than you. You are constantly reminded that someone else hears things you haven’t yet heard.

In photography, many skip that stage entirely.

They may call themselves teachers, mentors, or coaches, but they’ve never been intensely mentored themselves. They’ve never submitted their work to rigorous critique. They’ve never stood in a room where they were clearly not the best—and had to learn anyway.

In music, you can’t avoid that.
In photography, you can.

What my photography mentors gave me

The photographers who shaped me most were the ones who functioned like conductors.

They didn’t just teach me how to use a camera. They taught me:

  • How to see
  • How to wait
  • How to listen to a story before telling it
  • How to accept correction without defensiveness

They didn’t flatter me. They challenged me. They told me when something wasn’t working—and why. And they helped me understand that doing something correctly is very different from doing it well.

That mindset came directly from music.

Why so many photographers stall

Many photographers plateau not because they lack talent, but because they’ve never learned to submit to the craft.

They want expression without discipline.
Recognition without critique.
Authority without accountability.

In music, those shortcuts don’t exist.

You don’t get to solo just because you feel called to it.
You don’t lead just because you want to.
You don’t stop learning because you finally hit all the notes.

The lesson music taught me—and photography confirmed

If you’re not listening, you’re not improving.

That applies to musicians.
It applies to photographers.
It applies to storytellers.
It applies to leaders.

The photographers who grow the most are the ones who eventually embrace what musicians learn early: that mastery requires humility, structure, and people who hear what you cannot yet hear.

The rest may make noise.
But they’ll never really make music.

When Technical Mastery Is No Longer the Differentiator

Reading Time: 4 minutes

When Technical Mastery Is No Longer the Differentiator

There was a time when a photographer’s reputation rose or fell on technical proficiency.

If you could consistently nail focus, exposure, timing, and composition—especially under challenging conditions—you stood apart. Your skill set wasn’t standard, and your results proved it.

Wildlife photography is a perfect example.

Back in the film days, capturing a bird in flight that was sharp, well-exposed, and properly framed was incredibly difficult. Autofocus systems were slow. Film latitude was unforgiving. Motor drives typically gave you five frames per second, if you were lucky. You waited, anticipated, committed—and hoped.

Today? You’re shooting 20–30 frames per second. Eye-detect autofocus tracks flawlessly. Exposure is nailed automatically. From a single pass of a bird, you might come home with 40 or 60 frames that are all technically perfect.

The challenge has shifted.

You’re no longer asking, Did I get it?

You’re asking, Which one says it best?

When Perfect Is the Starting Line

Modern cameras have flattened the technical playing field. Sharpness, exposure, and color accuracy are no longer rare skills—they’re default outcomes. That doesn’t diminish photography, but it does redefine what separates meaningful work from forgettable images.

When everything is technically correct, the question becomes:

  • Does this image communicate something?
  • Does it move the story forward?
  • Does it reveal relationship, tension, purpose, or meaning?

This is where many conversations drift toward “creativity” or “artistry.” And while that’s not wrong, it can be vague and unhelpful.

The Roswell Criterium

As a storyteller, I see the shift differently.

The real differentiator today isn’t creativity for creativity’s sake—it’s intentional storytelling.

Story First, Camera Second

Great storytelling photography starts long before the shutter is pressed.

Memorial Day @ Georgia National Cemetery

It starts with understanding:

  • Who is this story about?
  • What is actually happening beneath the surface?
  • What moments matter most?
  • Where do light, space, and timing intersect with meaning?

Once you know the story, your job is to position yourself—physically and mentally—to capture it.

That means:

  • Choosing light that supports the emotion
  • Selecting compositions that remove distraction
  • Anticipating moments instead of reacting to them
  • Working the scene, not just standing in front of it

Technical perfection gives you freedom. A story gives you direction.

Philip with his grandfather, Floyd Newberry.

Building a Visual Storyline

When photographers think like storytellers, they stop chasing single “hero shots” and start building narratives. This applies whether you’re photographing a nonprofit, a business, a wedding, a mission trip, or wildlife.

Here’s how different types of images work together to tell a complete story:

Opener
Sets the scene. Establishes place, mood, and context. It answers the question: Where are we, and why does it matter?

Decisive Moment
This image can stand alone. One frame that captures the heart of the story—the moment where emotion, action, and meaning converge.

Details
Often overlooked, these images are visual punctuation. They slow the pace, add texture, and support transitions—especially in multimedia storytelling. Details invite viewers closer.

Sequences
A short series of images that shows progression or change. Sequences add rhythm and variety, helping the viewer experience movement and time.

High Overall Shot
Pulls back to show how all the elements relate. This perspective gives clarity and scale, helping the viewer understand the bigger picture.

Portraits
Portraits introduce the characters. They humanize the story and create a connection. Without them, the story lacks an anchor.

Closer
The visual conclusion. It doesn’t have to be literal or predictable. A strong closer leaves the viewer with reflection, resolution, or a sense of continuation beyond the frame.

When you shoot with these roles in mind, you stop overshooting and start seeing.

Memorial Day @ Georgia National Cemetery

Feeling the Story, Not Just Seeing It

What ultimately separates strong storytelling photographs from competent ones isn’t gear, speed, or even experience—it’s emotional awareness.

The most compelling images are made by photographers who are emotionally present.

That begins with empathy. When you genuinely care about the people or subject you’re photographing, you start to anticipate moments rather than chase them. You recognize when something meaningful is about to happen because you understand what’s at stake.

It continues with observation. Emotional moments rarely announce themselves. They show up in small gestures, pauses, expressions, and interactions. Photographers who slow down and truly watch are the ones who catch them.

There’s also an element of self-awareness. The more you understand your own emotions, the better you recognize them in others. Storytelling photography isn’t just about documenting what’s happening—it’s about interpreting it with honesty.

Engagement matters too. When people trust you, they relax. When they relax, real moments surface. Connection creates access.

And finally, there’s presence. Being fully in the moment—undistracted, unhurried—allows you to respond intuitively. Technical mastery fades into the background, and instinct takes over.

The New Measure of Competence

Today, technical skill is assumed.

What clients, editors, and audiences respond to is whether your images mean something.

Can you:

  • Understand the story before you arrive?
  • Recognize the moments that matter?
  • Build a visual narrative instead of a highlight reel?
  • Deliver images that feel honest, human, and intentional?

Modern cameras can do incredible things.

But they can’t listen. They can’t empathize. They can’t understand the purpose.

That part is still entirely up to you.

And that’s where storytelling photographers continue to stand apart.

God With Us, Seen From the Aisles and the Balcony

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Last night I had the privilege of covering two very different Christmas Eve services at Dunwoody United Methodist Church—and together they told one complete story.

The evening began with the Family Service, filled with children’s choirs, wide eyes, nervous smiles, and that wonderful mix of excitement and holy chaos that only happens when kids lead worship. Later came the Candlelight Communion services, quieter, slower, and heavy with meaning as the sanctuary filled with small flames pushing back the darkness.

From a photographer’s perspective, it was a night of constant movement and constant decision-making.

I carried three lenses:

  • Nikon 100–400mm for moments I couldn’t physically get close to—tight expressions, worship leaders, and details unfolding across the chancel.
  • 24–120mm f/4, my workhorse, for flexibility while moving quickly between scenes.
  • 35mm f/1.4, which came out during the candlelight portions of the service, when available light mattered most.

That 35mm lens was less about technical perfection and more about presence. Candlelight doesn’t wait. Faces glow for just a moment. Hands cup flames carefully. Shadows fall where they will. That lens let me stay honest to the atmosphere without overpowering it.

Throughout both services, I found myself running—literally—between the main floor and the balcony, sometimes multiple times during a single service. From the floor, I could feel the emotion. From above, I could see the story: the worship team leading, the congregation responding, the sanctuary breathing together.

Was I always in the perfect position at the ideal moment?
No.

But Christmas Eve rarely gives you perfection. It gives you meaning.

By the end of the night, what mattered most to me wasn’t whether I captured every ideal angle, but whether the coverage reflected the fullness of worship—leaders and congregation, children and adults, light and shadow, celebration and reverence.

As I worked, one phrase kept coming to mind:

“The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel (which means ‘God with us’).” — Matthew 1:23

Christmas is not just about a moment that happened long ago. It’s about God choosing to be present—in rooms full of children singing a little too loudly, in sanctuaries lit by candles, in communities gathered together in hope.

Last night, I didn’t just photograph services.
I photographed God with us—in motion, in worship, and in the shared light passed from one candle to another.

And that’s a story worth telling.

A Photographer’s Best Friend for Large Group Photos: The Ladder

Reading Time: 2 minutes

If you’ve ever been responsible for photographing a large group, you already know the pressure. One blink, one blocked face, one row slightly out of focus—and suddenly you’re wishing you had a do-over.

One of the simplest tools that makes a massive difference in large-group photography is a surprisingly low-tech one: a ladder.

Why a Ladder Changes Everything

When you’re photographing large groups, the biggest challenge is usually seeing everyone’s face clearly. Shooting at the same eye level as the group works well for small groups, but once you reach three rows or more, things quickly become complicated.

As soon as you elevate yourself—even just a few feet—you’re no longer fighting heads stacked directly behind one another. Looking down at the group creates natural separation between faces. Chins drop slightly, eyes turn upward, and suddenly you can see everyone much more clearly.

This isn’t nearly as important for small groups, but once you’re dealing with multiple rows, a ladder quickly becomes your best friend.

Bonus Benefit: Fewer “Raccoon Eyes”

The ladder doesn’t just improve visibility—it also improves lighting.

When you’re outdoors, and the sun is overhead, people often end up with deep shadows in their eye sockets, commonly called “raccoon eyes.” By shooting from a slightly higher angle, you reduce how deeply those shadows fall across the face. Even without additional lighting, that elevated perspective can noticeably improve how faces look.

Trudy Cathy White’s 70th Surprise Birthday

Lighting Matters as Much as Height

Right alongside the ladder in importance is good lighting.

My go-to solution for large groups—especially when consistency matters—is using strobes. Strobes allow me to put enough light on faces to keep things even from the front row to the back row. They also give me control, which is critical when you don’t want ambient light dictating image quality.

Even outdoors, strobes combined with a ladder give you a one-two punch: better angles and better light.

A Practical Camera Settings Tip

One technical detail often overlooked is where noise is introduced in your camera’s ISO settings.

With my Nikon Z9, I don’t really see noticeable noise until around ISO 1600. That gives me flexibility. Increasing ISO doesn’t just affect exposure—it also makes your flashes effectively more potent because they don’t have to work as hard.

The benefit? You’re not firing your strobes at full power. Lower power means faster recycling times, which is critical when photographing large groups. You don’t want to be standing there waiting for your lights to turn on while expressions fade and attention drifts.

Fast recycle times keep the session moving and help you capture multiple frames quickly—insurance against blinks and wandering eyes.

One More Important Piece

If you want to go deeper into group photography, I’ve already written a detailed post on aperture and focus, both of which are just as critical as height and lighting.

You can read that here:
👉 https://picturestoryteller.com/2022/08/27/what-aperture-should-you-use-for-group-photo/

Final Thought

Great group photos aren’t about luck—they’re about stacking small advantages. A ladder gives you better angles. Good lighting gives you consistency. Smart camera settings deliver speed and reliability.

Sometimes the most effective tools aren’t fancy at all—they help you see people better.

Test Your Gear Before the Job: A Lesson I Keep Re-Learning

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Anytime I buy new camera gear—or even pull something off the shelf that I haven’t used in a while—I remind myself of one simple truth: never take it to a client job until you’ve tested it thoroughly.

Today was one of those reminders.

I’m preparing for a project in a few days, so I spent the morning working with my Nikon Z9 and the DJI Mic 2 system. I’ve been using both for a while now, but like anything in our world, settings change, firmware updates happen, and sometimes the details fade if you haven’t touched something in a few months.

Before I point a camera at a client, I want to know exactly what each setting does—and why. I don’t want to be the person who finds a “recommended setting” and rolls with it. I want to understand the concept behind each control so I know when to adjust it and how it affects the recording. That knowledge gives me confidence, and confidence lets me focus on the story instead of the gear.

Refreshing on the DJI Mic 2

I pulled up a couple of YouTube videos to refresh my memory on the DJI Mic 2—mainly because there are a few settings I dial in once, forget about, and then have to relearn the next time I use it. One of those was the “Camera” setting inside the DJI receiver menu.

What I confirmed (again!) is that this setting controls the output gain from the DJI receiver going into the camera’s mic input. That’s it. It’s easy to overthink.

Here’s how I approach it:

How I Set Gain Between the DJI Mic 2 and the Nikon Z9

Think of it like a two-stage system:

  1. DJI Mic 2 Output Gain (Camera Setting on the Receiver)
    This is the signal strength from the DJI receiver to the Z9.
    I prefer to keep this relatively low because a strong signal going into the camera can easily clip. The DJI mics are quiet and clean, so lowering the output gives the camera room to breathe. The gain is set at +9 on the DJI Mic 2.
  2. Nikon Z9 Input Gain
    This is where I fine-tune the actual recording level.
    On the Z9, I usually start around 3–4 and adjust based on the speaker’s volume. This keeps the preamps clean and reduces the risk of distortion.

In short:
Lower gain on the DJI receiver, controlled gain on the Z9. Keep camera input low, and use the receiver’s gain to boost the signal, while disabling transmitter noise reduction and using windscreens for the best quality in post-production.

That combination gives me headroom and cleaner audio.

The Two-Track Safety Net: Why I Love 32-Bit Float

When I run the DJI Mic 2 with the Z9, I think of it as two simultaneous recordings:

  1. The main audio:
    The signal goes from the mic transmitter → receiver → into the Z9. This is what gets synced to the video automatically.
  2. The backup:
    Each transmitter records internally in 32-bit Float.
    That’s a huge safety net.
    If someone laughs loudly or suddenly projects, the camera track might clip—but the 32-bit float file won’t. Later, I can pull the file off the transmitter via USB-C, sync it, and choose whichever track sounds better.

This is especially helpful when I’m filming conversations or podcasts where levels can jump without warning.

Watching, Listening, and Staying Ahead of Trouble

The most significant part of testing is simply getting comfortable enough that monitoring becomes second nature. When the job comes, I want to be able to glance at my setup and instantly know everything is healthy.

During the podcast shoot I’m prepping for, I’ll be:

  • Watching the Z9:
    The red box around the frame indicates it’s recording, and I’ll keep an eye on the camera’s meters.
  • Watching the DJI Mic 2 receiver:
    It gives me the same visual reassurance: a red box and levels for each mic.
  • Listening on headphones:
    No guessing. No hoping. Just explicit confirmation that the audio hitting the camera is clean.

Why All This Matters

Gear is expensive. Clients are trusting. And once the moment is gone, it’s gone.

Testing isn’t about paranoia—it’s about stewardship. It’s about respecting the people you’re serving enough to make sure your tools are ready long before you walk into the room.

Every time I sit down with new equipment—or equipment I haven’t used in a while—I’m reminded that the best storytellers aren’t just creative. They’re prepared.

And that preparation starts long before the record button is pressed.

Tagged :

Bracketing and HDR: How I Capture and Process Stunning Drone and Commercial Real Estate Images

Reading Time: 3 minutes

When I’m out shooting with my drone—or capturing commercial real estate on the ground—one of my go-to techniques is bracketing exposures. I typically shoot 3 to 5 bracketed exposures, giving me a range of brightness values from shadows to highlights. This approach ensures I can capture all the details in a scene, even when the lighting is challenging.

For drone photography, this is especially helpful because the sky and ground often have drastically different exposures. On commercial real estate shoots, it’s equally valid for interiors with windows or bright exterior light spilling in.

These are the three exposures, each one stop apart, shown in Photo Mechanic.

Showing the Range

Here’s how it works: I take multiple exposures of the same scene—one slightly underexposed, one at the correct exposure, and one overexposed somewhat (sometimes adding more for extreme lighting conditions). When I show clients the raw images, it’s easy to see how each exposure captures different details—shadows, midtones, or highlights.

Three individual exposures plus the final HDR merge on top. Lightroom displays all four in the corner, showing that this is a stacked set of images.

Processing in Lightroom

Once I’ve captured the bracketed exposures, I bring them into Lightroom. The software automatically aligns the images, compensating for any slight movement from wind, the drone, or handheld shooting. Lightroom then merges the images into an HDR (High Dynamic Range) photo, combining the best parts of each exposure. This automated process significantly reduces noise, especially in shadow areas, and helps retain maximum resolution.

After Lightroom’s HDR processing, I usually tweak the image slightly—adjusting contrast, vibrance, or fine-tuning exposure—to create the final look before delivering it to the client. These subtle adjustments can elevate the image from good to stunning without overprocessing.

Going the Extra Mile with Photoshop

Occasionally, I take things a step further. If I feel I can get a better result than Lightroom’s automatic process, I’ll open the bracketed exposures as layers in Photoshop and blend them manually. This method gives me complete control over how shadows, highlights, and textures interact. It’s more time-consuming but can be worth it for challenging lighting or premium commercial projects.

Using a Tripod

For ground-based commercial real estate shots, I almost always use a tripod. This ensures that each exposure lines up perfectly, making both automatic and manual blending much easier. For drones, stability comes from the aircraft itself, but the principle remains the same: the more consistent your framing, the cleaner your HDR result.

The Benefits

Bracketing and HDR processing not only give you better dynamic range but also reduce noise, preserve resolution, and allow you to deliver images that genuinely reflect the scene as the eye sees it. Whether you’re photographing a cityscape from above or a high-end office space on the ground, this technique ensures your work looks polished and professional.

Tagged : /

Why Do Filmmakers Always Wet the Asphalt?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

If you’ve ever watched a movie and noticed the streets glistening at night—even when it hasn’t rained—you’re not imagining things. Filmmakers often hose down the pavement on purpose. Once you know why, you’ll not see it again.

And honestly, it’s a fun peek behind the curtain for anyone who loves visuals, whether you’re holding a cinema camera or a smartphone.

1. Water Turns Asphalt Into a Giant Reflector

Dry pavement absorbs light. Wet pavement reflects it.

When you’re shooting at night, reflections are your best friend. They bounce light around the scene, lifting shadows and giving you more control over the mood. Suddenly, the frame comes alive—streetlights glow, neon signs shimmer, and the whole scene gains depth without the need for massive lighting setups.

For a cinematographer, that reflection is basically free production value.

2. It Adds Texture and Depth

Water creates subtle highlights and gradients in the ground—something a flat, dry surface can’t provide. The texture helps guide the viewer’s eye and keeps the frame visually interesting. Even in a wide shot where nothing dramatic is happening, that glisten adds movement and dimension.

As a storyteller, anytime you can add depth without distracting from the subject, you’re strengthening the scene.

Just Coffee and Frontera de Cristo

3. It Helps Shape the Light

When you wet the asphalt, you control how light spills into the scene.
A small light can suddenly feel bigger.
A practical light (like a lamp in a window or a car headlight) becomes more expressive.
You can create leading lines or shape compositions simply by how you position light against the reflective surface.

It’s one of those subtle techniques that viewers feel more than they consciously notice.

Piccadilly Square in London

4. It Makes Night Scenes More Believable

This one surprises a lot of people: wet pavement often feels more natural to viewers.
Why?
Because in real life, nighttime humidity, dew, or recent rain often leave streets looking moist—even if we don’t pay attention.

A bone-dry street at night can look oddly fake or “too clean.” Wet asphalt softens that problem and helps blend all the lighting elements, especially in urban settings.

Piccadilly Square in London

5. It Adds Mood and Atmosphere

A glistening street carries emotional weight.
It can feel dramatic, romantic, mysterious, or even dangerous depending on the story. Film is all about mood, and water enhances that mood in ways that don’t call attention to themselves.

Think of your favorite nighttime scenes in classic noir. Nearly all of them were shot on wet streets—and for good reason.

Broadway, New York City

6. It Hides Imperfections

Production budgets don’t always allow for pristine streets or perfectly resurfaced roads. Water gives you a cheap way to hide cracks, patchwork, and other visual distractions. Once the light hits that sheen, the viewer focuses on the reflections—not the flaws.

Bringing This Into Your Own Photography or Video

Even when I’m shooting for clients at Stanley Leary: Crafting Stories that Change Lives, I look for ways to use surfaces to shape light—wet pavement, shiny floors, polished tables —anything that adds depth.

You don’t need a film crew or a fire hydrant key. Sometimes, just the right angle, a small light, and a reflective surface can elevate your shot from “fine” to “cinematic.”

The Bottom Line

Filmmakers wet the asphalt because it’s one of the easiest ways to make a scene look richer, more dimensional, and more emotional—especially at night. It’s a simple trick with a big payoff.

And next time you’re watching a movie and see those gleaming streets, you’ll know exactly why.

How My Upbringing, Autism, and Photojournalism Shaped How I Connect with People

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Growing up as the son of a pastor and a mother who supported his work, I was surrounded by people who genuinely cared about others. My parents weren’t just interested in names or titles—they were interested in gifts, talents, and the unique ways people could serve God. They asked questions, noticed details, and encouraged those around them to step into their calling. From a young age, I saw the power of paying attention to people beyond the surface.

At the same time, my experience as someone with autism shaped how I interacted with the world. I identify strongly with the Asperger’s description—often more comfortable observing than immediately joining in, drawn to patterns, and deeply focused on understanding details that others might overlook. While this could make social interactions challenging, it also gave me a unique lens through which to see people.

That lens became even more refined through my work as a photojournalist. My job was to capture a person’s story through images—to see the life behind the face. This required more than technical skill; it required listening, paying attention, and asking questions in ways that allowed someone to open up. Over time, I learned that when people feel truly heard, when their story is sought and valued, something remarkable happens—they feel seen.

Today, I notice that even in small conversations, I carry this same curiosity. I want to know people’s stories, not just their jobs, hometowns, or favorite sports teams. I’ve noticed that few people seem genuinely interested in these deeper layers, but when I take the time to ask and listen, the conversation transforms. People respond differently—they open up, relax, and share parts of themselves that rarely come out in casual chatter.

This approach doesn’t just apply to photography or formal interviews. It’s how I try to live my life: with curiosity, patience, and a genuine interest in others. I’ve found that this practice, shaped by my upbringing, my autism, and my photojournalism work, creates connection in a way that surface-level conversation rarely can. It’s not about extracting information; it’s about honoring the person in front of me and the story they carry.

In a world that often rushes through interactions, I’ve learned the value of slowing down, listening, and letting people be seen. And the more I do this, the more I realize that connection—the kind that leaves a mark—comes not from talking, but from listening.

Tagged : /